Export of Norwegian whale blubber a threat to human health

Press release - 7 May, 2002

Ellingsen factory, biggest whale meat and blubber storage in Norway.

A report released today by Greenpeace in Tokyo reveals that whale blubber stored in Norway awaiting export to Japan is unfit for human consumption.(1) The report written by independent scientists in Germany concludes that the samples analysed are contaminated with various halogenated-organic contaminants such as PCBs, DDT and brominated flame retardants.(2)

"It would be irresponsible of the Norwegian government to export whale blubber to Japan and irresponsible of the Japanese government to sell it for eating. It is unfit for human consumption and should be disposed of safely and further investigation is highly recommended," said Thilo Maack, Greenpeace oceans campaigner. "If someone ate a piece of whale blubber the size of my thumb, they would be dosing themselves many times over the advisory limits of some of the most toxic compounds known to humans."

Japan and Norway have been discussing a resumption in whale trade following Norway's decision in January 2001 to lift its ban on whale exports. The Fisheries Agency of Japan applied to the Trade Ministry for permission to import whale meat from Norway, but as yet no shipments have been made. Norway's decision to begin exporting whale meat and blubber to Japan has been fuelled by the desire of the Norwegian whalers to profit from the high prices paid for whale products on the luxury food market in Japan. The export of whale products runs contrary to the ban imposed by the Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).

Norwegian traders have stockpiled 1000 metric tonnes of whale blubber in cold storage waiting for export. Last year, the Japanese government had to put two hundred metric tonnes of unsold whale meat and blubber in storage due to the declining market for whale products in Japan.

The report confirms the fears of environmentalists and Japanese consumer groups that whale products are unfit for eating.(3) "The presence of such toxic chemicals in whale blubber shows the extent to which our oceans are contaminated and underlines how vital it is that whales are protected from hunting and that the current international ban on trade remains intact. The status of the minke whales hunted by Norway is uncertain and these results show that whales are vulnerable to not only commercial whaling activities but also to wider environmental threats," said Maack.(4)

The complete report Evaluation of Contaminats in Meat and Blubber of Minke Whales is available for download as a pdf.

Notes: (1) Evaluation of Contaminants in Meat and Blubber of Minke Whales, Dr. Martin Hassauer, Jan Oltmanns, Dr. Klaus Schneider of Forschungs-und Beratungsinstitut Gefahrstoffe GmbH. (2) These are persistent organic pollutants (POPs), amongst the most toxic chemicals known to humankind. POPs are particularly resistant to natural breakdown and accumulate in the fatty tissues of both humans and animals. Mammals that are higher up the food chain, such as whales, are particularly vulnerable to POPs. In 2001, world governments agreed that POPs must be eliminated from the planet under the Stockholm Convention. (3) A Norwegian university study estimates that the export market could reach NKr50 million (US $ 5.5million), if 20 percent of the whale catch and 100 per cent of the blubber were exported. Most of the meat would be exported to Japan, where blubber is considered a delicacy. In protest against Norway's resumption of whale trading, some airlines are refusing to carry the product." Quest Economics Database World of Information Country Report April 24, 2002 (3) "It is very surprising that the Japanese are encouraging the eating of whale meat with shoppers queuing for free samples of canned whale stew, deep-fried whale meat and blubber recipes in downtown Tokyo," Dr. Stone said, "Unfortunately, what these unsuspecting consumers probably received was a cocktail of toxins and contaminants that have made their way into our seas and oceans, particularly during the last 50 years." Parliamentary Secretary for the Antarctic, Dr. Sharman Stone, Media Release, 12 April 2002. (4) There is evidence that toxic pollution, ship noise, ozone depletion, global warming, and overfishing threaten whale populations. For more information see the Greenpeace report, “Whales In A Degraded Ocean” (available on the Greenpeace website).