Kyoto negotiations – Bali

Page - March 6, 2008
In December, over 10,000 delegates from governments, media, NGOs and business met in Bali to agree on the framework for negotiating the second phase of the Kyoto protocol. Given Kyoto is the only international treaty that sets binding targets for countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, the stakes couldn’t have been higher.

In December, over 10,000 delegates from governments, media, NGOs and business met in Bali to agree on the framework for negotiating the second phase of the Kyoto protocol.

What followed were two extraordinary weeks; from the US insistence on taking a wrecking ball to the talks, to the lead UN negotiator breaking down in tears, to the necessary extension of the negotiating deadline; there was no doubting how critical an agreement was.

At the last moment, and under intense international scrutiny, the US caved in, allowing a framework to be agreed. There's now aprocess and a timeline with which to move forward and shape the protocol post-2012. The outcome wasn't as strong or clear as it could have been, but a huge amount was achieved and importantly the Kyoto show is still on the road.

Save the forests, save the climate

Greenpeace's Forests Defenders Camp was set up in the Sumatran rainforests in Indonesia, ahead of the December climate negotiations in Bali, to highlight the role deforestation plays in climate change, and challenge the destruction at its source. (20 per cent of global emissions come from deforestation, more emissions than the world's entire transport sector).

Indonesian forests are being destroyed faster than in any other part of the world, for logging and oil palm plantations. This is pushing unique animals like the orangutan and Sumatran tiger, to the brink of extinction. While the loss of forests is bad enough, the carbon released is contributing to climate change and increasing the urgency of acting to protect the world's remaining forests.

The Forest Defenders Camp helped put forest destruction on the international agenda, and at the end of the Bali climate talkscountries agreed to bring deforestation into the global climate treaty. They will embark on a process over the next two years to do this.

Mr Splashy Pants

Over 150,000 people voted in our competition to name the humpback whales we were tracking on their migration to the Southern Ocean. The winner? Mr Splashy Pants, by a nautical mile! It seems like the world couldn't get enough of Mr Splashy Pants with many websites encouraging their readers to vote for 'Splashy'.

Mr Splashy Pants got a huge 119,367 votes (over 78 percent of the vote) with his nearest rival being Humphrey at 4,329 (lessthan 3 percent). The rest of the top ten were Aiko, Libertad, Mira, Kaimana, Aurora, Shanti, Amal and Manami.For the people who voted for a name other than Mr Splashy Pants, take heart. The scientists involved in the Great Whale Trail tagged 20 humpback whales in the South Pacific. The top seven names will be used to name whales.

Traffic soars on Greenpeace Japan website

Greenpeace's Japanese office has been working hard to tell the Japanese public the truth about whaling, and it is work that isbeginning to pay off. After decades of media blackout of the antiwhaling perspective, a serious debate is beginning to emerge within Japan itself.

In mid-January, traffic on the Greenpeace Japan website soared from10,000 hits a day to over 10,000 hits in just one hour. Visitors to the website signed up to an online petition asking Japanese government ministers to stop squandering taxpayers' money on whaling.

Comments have been flooding in from all over Japan, with the following from a Tokyo resident typical of the sentiment expressed:"What is the purpose of whaling? We do not want to eat whale. If 'research' is the real purpose, we can do it without killing them, can't we? Do not waste our taxes catching whales but instead protect them".

Categories