2011 Canned Tuna Ranking

Standard Page - 13 May, 2011
Tuna brands play a key role in the overfishing crisis by selling us unsustainable tuna. It's time every brand takes responsibility.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
8
9
10
11
12
12
13
14
14
15
Rating - GOOD
Rating - Must Improve
Rating - VERY POOR

Welcome to the updated edition of our Australian Canned Tuna Guide. Since we launched the first guide just 2 years ago there have been mammoth improvements. This is thanks to you ocean lovers demanding change!

Then

No tuna brand even knew where or how their tuna was caught.

No Australian brand sold sustainably-caught tuna.

Overfished yellowfin tuna was widely used.

Now

Nearly every brand can tell you where and how their tuna is caught.

One Australian brand – Safcol – has switched to 100% sustainably-caught tuna.

Nearly every major brand has released a sustainable option. In fact there’s a pole and line option in almost every supermarket.

So what’s the problem?

Most tuna sold in Australia is still caught using destructive fishing methods, which obliterate tuna stocks and kill other marine life. This has got to stop if we are to restore the health of our oceans. Tuna brands should also refuse to sell tuna species most at risk and use their power to support vital marine reserves. Take action now!

Click on a brand to see how they rate.

Reef at risk

Poster-size tuna ranking now available

Is your fridge door looking a bit bare? Kitchen noticeboard at your office in need of some new reading material? Then why not download our new poster-sized tuna guide so you can help spread the sustainable tuna message further.

 

Methodology

The tuna brands were ranked based on the following criteria:

  • Sustainability Policy. It is essential that companies have in place an effective policy that ensures their products are produced sustainably.
  • Fishing methods used. Most tuna is caught using purse seine nets with fish aggregation devices (FADs), a method responsible for high levels of bycatch including sharks and other marine life as well as juvenile tuna from threatened species. In contrast, pole and line fishing offers a less wasteful solution, with reduced bycatch. Pole and line fisheries also tend to offer greater economic returns to local populations. Purse seine fishing without FADs is an acceptable secondary option.
  • Tuna species used. Each tuna species is under different levels of pressure. Bigeye and Yellowfin tuna are overfished and at risk. Skipjack tuna is declining, but is the tuna species of least concern.
  • Labelling. Providing comprehensive information on labels gives customers the opportunity to make an informed choice based on the product’s sustainability. Labels should include the species name, catch method and the area the fish was caught in.
  • Support for marine reserves and equitable tuna policies. Companies should offer public support for the establishment of marine reserves, including the proposed protected areas known as, the Pacific Commons. This will ensure the long-term sustainability of fish stocks and healthy marine ecosystems. It is equally important that reasonable economic benefits are returned to the countries who own the rights to individual fish stocks.
  • Use of illegal or unregulated products Illegal fishing accounts for up to 46% of fishing activity in the Pacific, exacerbating the overfishing crisis. Companies should be able to guarantee their supply chain does not include operators that engage in illegal, unregulated or unreported (IUU) fishing.

The information has been obtained from a combination of brand responses to a Greenpeace product survey, correspondence with brands and retailers, publically available information and product evaluation.

Greenpeace is grateful for the assistance provided by retailers and brand suppliers in providing relevant information as well as for the assistance provided by various third party experts.