Skip navigation.
Greenpeace activists inspect barge carrying genetically engineered 
soya.

Greenpeace activists inspect a barge carrying GE soya.

Enlarge image

Quite simply, the biotech industry must keep GE out of the environment and back in the lab.

The fundamental basis for genetic engineering (GE) is a theory or 'dogma' that dates from the 1950s and is now considered over-simplistic. 

Many fundamental questions regarding the functioning of DNA and genes remain unanswered. Modern science has shown the mechanisms and controls of gene expression to be far more complex than first thought.

   

"Anyone that says 'Oh, we know that this is perfectly safe,' I say is either unbelievably stupid or deliberately lying. The reality is we don't know. The experiments simply haven't been done and we now have become the guinea pigs."

   

Dr David Suzuki

 
GE is a crude and old fashioned technology which has lead to the many surprises and unexpected effects associated with GE organisms. As such the effects of GE crops on the environment and human health cannot be reliably predicted.

Therefore, no further GE organisms should be released into the environment or the food chain.

The strict liability solution

The last decade has shown conclusively that the GE companies are incapable of acting responsibly. There have been countless cases of companies breaking the law and releasing untested and unauthorized GE organisms into the environment.

The only solution that will protect the environment and non-GE farmers is a 'strict product liability' regime. This means that the company that stands to gain from its product (such as Monsanto) also bears the risks should any harm occur. If contamination occurs,  if economic damage is shown, it is the biotech companies that are liable for those costs.

Strict product liability is simple, fair and effective and should be implemented via Australia’s Gene Technology Act.