You Are Here:
Greenpeace volunteers took New South Wales "Premier Iemma" and an anti-coal message to the Sydney suburbs of Balmain and Rozelle, on Monday 5 March, in the lead-up to the New South Wales election.
Enlarge imageThe New South Wales state election has been won. In the lead up, there was lots of talk about climate change and water shortages. So how does the reelected Iemma government stack up on clean energy solutions?
In the lead up to the 2007 New South Wales election, communities got active on climate change as never before. Dozens of community climate action groups formed and held events and candidates forums to put candidates' climate policies under the spotlight. Meanwhile the Greens, Democrats and some independents advocated strong climate policies.
As it became obvious that the Liberal party had little chance of winning the election, Labor was under no pressure to promise real cuts in greenhouse pollution over the next decade.
At the start of the campaign, both parties supported a major expansion of New South Wales' coal industry, including the controversial Anvil Hill project. Neither major party has set a short or medium term target to reduce greenhouse pollution. Professor Nicholas Stern recommends 30 per cent reductions by 2020 as the minimum required to prevent the most dangerous impacts of global warming.
The New South Wales election was a missed opportunity on climate action for the major parties. However, the huge groundswell of voter demand for action on climate change hopefully means increased community pressure on the Iemma government to abandon plans to expand the New South Wales coal industry.
During the campaign Mr Iemma said "I do not want my kids to ask me in 10 years time why I didn't do more to address the issue of climate change." Why don't you ask him that question now? The premier really needs to start making some of the hard decisions to quit coal and make the shift to clean energy.