Skip navigation.

Mackay - Queensland, Australia — Monday 28 July 2008: Early this morning, Greenpeace activists in inflatables targeted a queue of almost 50 coal ships at Hay Point port in Queensland and are currently painting them with climate change protest messages such as: 'RUDD EXPORTING CO2', 'BARRIER REEF GONE', 'ICE CAPS GONE' and 'STOP COAL EXPANSION'. The peaceful action is to highlight the Rudd Government's plans to rapidly expand coal exports, when the world is trying to cut global emissions (1).

The protest comes as an Essential Research poll commissioned by Greenpeace reveals that 82% of Australians want Australia's coal exports capped or reduced (2). NSW exports 100 million tonnes (Mt) of coal each year and plans have been approved to double exports, which would contribute a further 270 Mt of CO2. Export coal expansion plans in Queensland will up exports by 170 Mt. This totals 729 million tonnes of CO2 just from these expansions: equal to 125% of Australia's total current emissions and the same as the annual CO2 pollution from 104 average sized coal-fired power stations.

"It is contradictory and immoral for Prime Minister Rudd to be expanding the export coal industry whilst talking about urgent action on climate change. Rudd's policies are increasingly at odds with his statements," said Greenpeace campaigner Simon Roz. "Just days ago in Port Douglas, Mr Rudd said 'Australia must act locally and globally on the challenge of climate change because if we fail great assets like the Great Barrier Reef will be fatally in peril''. Yet he is overseeing huge coal export expansion plans in NSW and in Queensland, which will accelerate climate change impacts. It begs the question, is Kevin Rudd going to shape up to be the climate leader Australians hoped he would be?

"When it comes to greenhouse pollution, out of sight is not out of mind. Coal burnt overseas contributes to the demise of all pristine environments; shipping Australian coal offshore will not save the Great Barrier Reef nor the Murray-Darling. Rudd should be ashamed at profiting from the short term gains of export coal at the expense of long-term solutions; the very least we can do is to cap our coal exports at current levels and ban future coal expansions, as four out of five Australians would like to see happen."

Not only is Australia one of the world's highest per capita polluters but we also export more CO2 than we emit domestically. In 2006/7, we exported 30% of the world's total coal exports, equal to 656 Mt of CO2. Australia is the world's largest exporter by far with the majority of our coal exported to developed nations, such as Japan and European countries, which could, and should, be using renewables not coal.

"To be an international leader on climate change Mr Rudd needs to stand up to the big polluters," Mr Roz said. "Cuts to domestic emissions will be negated if Australia ships hundreds of millions of tonnes of emissions elsewhere. Mr Rudd should instead be taking advantage of the global bounty of renewable industry opportunities - backing coal is taking Australia in the wrong direction."

Related Reports

Notes to Editor

(1) In April of this year, Environment Minister, Peter Garrett, approved the $1.3 billion Gladstone coal port expansion. This will increase Australia's exports by 25 million tonnes per year, creating 67.5 Mt of greenhouse pollution when completed. This is the roughly what Australia's total emissions for 2050 should be, based on two tonnes of greenhouse per capita according to Professor Stern.

In May 2008, the Federal Government promised $20 billion for infrastructure, most to be spent on increasing coal rail and port capacity. In the 2008 Budget they cemented their position: 'Plan To Secure The Future Of Coal' by allocating $500 million to clean coal, and did nothing to wind back the subsidies that go to encouraging the use of fossil fuels.

The Rudd Government has indicated its new Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) will give coal-fired power generators and coal mining companies cash or free permits to pollute, encouraging ongoing investment in the coal industry. Also money raised by the CPRS scheme will be handed back to the big polluters as subsidies for so called 'clean coal' technology trials

(2) Essential Research online poll of 1036 people conducted 15-20 July 2008:

For further information or comment

Louise Clifton, Communications Officer: 0438 204041 Simon Roz, Campaigner: 0408 011 177 Both onboard the Esperanza: +47 5140 7988 Michelle Thomas, Audio Visuals: 0404 096556