The controversial spent nuclear fuel transport was escorted by a police convoy from the Lucas Heights nuclear facility to Botany Bay. Greenpeace activists in inflatable boats exposed the transfer of 10 nuclear waste casks (containing 330 spent nuclear fuel rods) to cargo ship, the Seabird, at 2am. The shipment is headed for the US where it will join a 60,000 tonne stockpile of dangerous nuclear waste.
Nuclear transports are a risk to human health and the environment. They are vulnerable to accidents and pose a terrorist threat.
"In an age of terrorism and fears about nuclear proliferation, these
nuclear waste shipments are a magnet for terrorist activity. Spent fuel
rods can be combined with explosives to make 'dirty' nuclear bombs."
Greenpeace campaigns manager, Stephen Campbell
Last night's secretive shipment highlights serious national security concerns. It casts a dark shadow on the Howard government's push for nuclear power as a solution to climate change.
Nuclear no solution to climate change
Nuclear power is no solution to climate change. The government's own recent report found that
if Australia built 25 nuclear reactors by 2050, at enormous cost, it would cut Australia's emissions by only eight to 18 per cent. Compare this to energy efficiency and renewable energy like solar, wind and geothermal, which could cut Australia's emissions 30 per cent by 2020.
The majority of Australians don't want nuclear power or spent nuclear fuel transportations creating dangerous nuclear highways through their streets.
The clean solutions to climate change are energy efficiency and renewable energy.
Find out how renewable energy can supply Australia's power needs
Read more about why nuclear is not an option