Greenpeace activists take to the streets of Sydney to express their opposition to the whaling in the Southern Oceans. They deliver a letter to the visiting Japanese Ministers at Government House.
International —
The financial backers of the Japanese whaling industry are pulling out of the business after months of pressure from Greenpeace, online activists, consumers and other environmental groups.
The move highlights that whaling is bad for business, and weakens the Japanese government's justification for their so-called ‘scientific’ whaling program.
The financial backers of the Japanese whaling industry are pulling out
of the business after months of pressure from Greenpeace, online
activists, consumers and other environmental groups.
The
move highlights that whaling is bad for business, and weakens the
Japanese government's justification for their so-called ‘scientific’
whaling program.
A drowning business
Two
of the world’s largest seafood suppliers - Gortons, Sealord and its
parent company Nissui – withdrew all support for Japanese whaling after
our campaign put Nissui in the spotlight.
Nissui is a one
third shareholder in Kyodo Senpaku, which owns and operates the whaling
fleet. This implicated Gortons (wholly owned by Nissui in the US) and
Sealord (50 per cent owned by Nissui in New Zealand) by linking them to
the whaling industry.
Greenpeace Australia Pacific campaign
manager Danny Kennedy said that the companies’ actions demolished the
commercial foundation of the Japanese whaling industry. "It also
removes any justification for continuing the so-called 'scientific'
whaling program, which aims to prove that industrial whaling can be
sustainable."
International pressure
In
late January 2006, Greenpeace announced that it was taking the fight
against whaling from the high seas to supermarket shelves.
In
Australia more than 40,000 people signed our web petition that urged
Sealord to pressure its parent company Nissui to get out of whaling.
Sealord
felt similar pressure from around 14,000 emails in New Zealand. In the
US Nissui felt pressure through its subsidiary Gorton's from
Greenpeace, the Humane Society and the Environmental Investigation
Agency.
In Argentina a Greenpeace-led campaign saw Nissui lose
seafood supply contracts, after activists placed stickers denouncing
whaling on Nissui products in supermarkets and more than 20,000 emails
were sent to Nissui headquarters.
Globally, people sent 100,000 emails to Nissui related companies through our international website.
It
seems that even in Japan the message that whaling is bad for business
is getting through. 'Research by Japanese newspapers shows that less
than 4 per cent of Japanese people eat whale meat, and the government
has to resort to force feeding whale meat to school children to reduce
its huge whale meat stockpile," said Kennedy.
"Japan now faces
increasing pressure to stop its annual whale slaughter, given that the
'data' they collect is commercially irrelevant and another 800 or so
whale carcasses are about to be added to Japan's 5000 ton mountain of
frozen whale meat.”
The next challenge
However,
the fight is far from over and the next challenge will take place this
June when the International Whaling Commission (IWC) meets to vote
whether the commercial whaling ban remains in place.
For years,
the Japanese government has spent billions of yen buying votes on the
commission in an attempt to overturn the ban. This year the Japanese
delegation believes it will be able to secure a majority of votes,
which will end the international ban on commercial whaling.
The
future of the ban depends on powerful anti-whaling governments like
Australia, the UK, the US, and Germany to prevent Japan buying votes at
the next IWC meeting.