Greenpeace petition drive demands GE food labelling

Greenpeace calls for immediate action from BC Premier Campbell on mandatory GE labelling

Press release - March 12, 2007
Greenpeace today launched a petition calling on the BC government to legislate mandatory labelling before the next election. The petition drive comes as a study is released in Europe showing that biotech giant Monsanto used incomplete data to obtain approval of its genetically modified corn and that laboratory rats, fed with a genetically engineered (GE) maize produced by Monsanto, have shown kidney and liver toxicity, according to a new study.(1)

The study, published today in the journal "Archives of Environmental

Contamination and Toxicology", analysed results of safety tests submitted by

Monsanto to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) when the company wasseeking authorisation to market its GE Maize variety MON863 in Canada. The data shows that MON863 has significant health risks associated with it; nonetheless, the CFIA approved the maize for unconfined release into theenvironment and for consumption by both humans and animals in 2003. The incriminating evidence was obtained by Greenpeace following a court case(2), and passed on for evaluation by a team of experts headed by Professor Gilles Eric Seralini, a governmental expert in genetic engineering technology from the University of Caen.(3)

"Consumers are already skeptical when it comes to GMOs and this latest newsabout Monsanto will only confirm those concerns. GMOs are inherently risky,and we should not be releasing these untested products into the environmentor into our food chain," said Josh Brandon, GE campaigner for Greenpeace."If GE products continue to appear in our food, however, consumers needlabels on these products so that they can make informed choices when itcomes to what they buy."  

The release of this latest data shows the urgent need for mandatory

labelling of GE products in BC. The results also confirm the warnings raised

by the Royal Society of Canada's expert panel on biotechnology.(4)  In 2001,

the panel of scientific experts found that the lack of independent

verification of company produced data could lead to the approval of

improperly tested and potentially unsafe products.  

"As many as 70% of the processed foods on store shelves in BC could containGE ingredients, and there is absolutely no way for consumers to know this important fact," said Eleanor Boyle of GE Free BC. "Consumers have a right to know what is in the food they eat, so that they can make the decisionwhether or not to consume this untested and risky technology. BC has theopportunity to lead the way on this issue in Canada and Premier Campbell should listen to British Columbians who want mandatory labelling of GMOs andtake action before the next provincial election."

A recent Greenpeace poll, found that 79 per cent of BC residents support

legislation requiring all GE food to be labelled, and indicated that the

issue could be significant in the next provincial election.(5)

- 30 -

For more information contact:

Josh Brandon, Greenpeace Canada, GE campaigner, cell: 604-721-7493

Eleanor Boyle, GE Free BC, cell: 604-230-2561

Andrew Male, Greenpeace Canada, Communications, cell: 416-880-2757

1) The article is published online (www.springerlink.com/content/1432-0703)

by the American journal Archives of Environmental Contamination and

Toxicology; it will be printed in May. A Greenpeace briefing on the study is

available on request.

2) For details, please refer to the Greenpeace paper: "The MON863case-a

chronicle of systematic deception

3) The analysis team was headed by Professor Seralini from University of Caenand included experts from the French independent scientific organisation CRIIGEN.

4) RSC, Royal Society of Canada (Expert Panel on the Future of Food

Technology) 2001.  Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the

Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada.  Ottawa: Royal Society of

Canada.

5) The Stratcom poll of 601 BC eligible voters was conducted between November23 and November 30, 2006.  It has a margin of error +/- 4.0%.  A copy of thereport is available on request.

Topics