Big question marks on genetically engineered corn

Feature story - August 7, 2007
Early on the morning of August 8th, Greenpeace activists labelled a genetically engineered (GE) corn field near Abbotsford, B.C. with a 61 metre question mark to highlight the absence of GE food labelling in Canada. Also, Greenpeace wanted to draw attention to the fact that there are many remaining questions about the safety of genetic engineering.

Greenpeace activists have created a 61-metre crop circle in a corn field in Abbotsford, British Columbia. The field contains Monsanto’s NK603 genetically engineered (GE) corn, which scientists recently linked with liver and kidney toxicity in rats. Greenpeace is calling for mandatorylabelling of GE foods across Canada.

Genetic engineering is an unpredictable and untested technology whichnew scientific evidence shows may result in toxic corn entering thefood system. Canada is one of a handful of countries that practice GEon a commercial scale, and that lack mandatory labelling.


Check out high resolution photos of the action at

gallery.greenpeace.ca

Ifthe government will not label GE food, Greenpeace will take initiative,locate GE fields and label the crops through actions like this. Canadagrows over 5.8 million hectares of GE crops, including 820,000 hectaresof GE corn.  That's an area of GE crops more than twice the size ofVancouver Island.  We are one of the top producers of GE worldwidealong with USA, Argentina, and Brazil. Forty countries around the worldalready have mandatory GE labelling in place. This action puts thegovernment of B.C., as well as ministers across the country on noticethat we expect results on our key demand for mandatory labelling of allgenetically engineered foods.

The field you see in thesepictures is within a few kilometres of organic farms, an elementaryschool and along a route promoted by the local chamber of commerce as apastoral "Circle Farm Tour." But there is nothing idyllic about geneticengineering. GE spreads and contaminates other crops. Greenpeace andGeneWatch UK have documented 142 incidents of contamination in the past10 years.   The herbicides which GE crops are designed to work withdestroy local vegetation and reduce the biodiversity of theenvironment.  New evidence shows Monsanto's herbicide Round Up candisrupt sexual hormones even at what are considered "non-toxiclevels".   GE is not safe for the environment.

Take Action

1)Write an email to B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell at premier@gov.bc.ca, asking him to put in place mandatory labelling legislation. Here is a sample letter you can use. Should B.C. or Quebec adopt mandatory labelling it will put pressure onother provinces and the federal government to follow suit.

2)     ContactGerry Ritz, federal Minister of Agriculture, and demand that GE corn be taken off the market in view of recent scientific evidence.

3)    If you live in B.C., download our petition, sign it, distribute it in your community and return it to Greenpeace at 1726 Commercial Drive, Vancouver BC, V5N 4A3.

4)    If you live in Quebec, please send an e-mail to Jean Charest asking him to keep his promise on mandatory GE labelling (in French).

Health and GMOs

GEmight not be good for human health either.  Tests done on corn growingin the field indicated that it contained a type of Monsanto GE cornknown as NK603.   This product was the subject of a study by the Frenchindependent research institute CRIIGEN which found signs of toxicity inrat feeding trials.  Rats fed the GE corn NK603 had statisticallysignificant differences in their kidneys and livers as well as unusualgrowth rates.  This research follows on the publication of a study inthe peer reviewed publication Archives of Environmental Contaminationand Toxicology showing further signs of toxicity in rats for anothervariety of Monsanto's GE corn MON863.   The study authors concluded:"with the present data it can not be concluded that GM corn MON863 is asafe product."  Both these studies were based on safety test dataMonsanto submitted to European regulatory authorities.  Greenpeaceobtained these data through a German court order and turned them overto CRIIGEN for independent analysis in 2005.  This controversy putsinto question the degree of seriousness of government regulatoryprocesses, as already well documented in the 2001 Royal society ofCanada report.   In a response addressed to Greenpeace on July 24,2007, the federal ministry of Agriculture refused to change policydespite recent scientific analysis that Greenpeace submitted to them ina letter dated April 12 2007.

Along with the two studies byCRIIGEN, a third study by Norwegian scientists found another variety ofGE corn, MON810 to cause immune responses in salmon.  This recent spateof studies on the health effects of GE confirms Greenpeace's warningsthat GE should not be released into the environment or into the foodsystem.  Greenpeace has compiled extensive evidence of the potentialhealth dangers of GE in a submission to the B.C. Conversation onHealth, a public consultation led by the B.C. ministry of health.   

Fortycountries around the world already have mandatory labellinglegislation, including Europe, South Korea, Japan and Australia.   Lastyear, the Quebec government released a report showing that the cost ofGE labelling would be only a fraction of previous estimates done byindustry  and the B.C. Provincial Health Officer recommended mandatorylabelling in his annual report.   Recent polls in Quebec and B.C. haveshown overwhelming support for mandatory labelling of GE foods.  InQuebec, a Leger Marketing poll released in May showed 86 per centsupport for mandatory labelling.   A Strategic Communications pollreleased in January showed 79 per cent of British Columbians wantmandatory labelling before the next provincial election.  

There are too many question marks around GE.

Topics