Today, our world is hotter than it has been in 2,000 years.

While the end of the 20th century may not necessarily be the warmest time in Earth's history, what is unique is that the warmth is global and cannot be explained by the natural mechanisms that explain previous warm periods. There is a broad scientific consensus that humanity is in large part responsible for this change, and that choices we make today will decide the climate of the future.

How are we changing the climate?

For more than a century, people have relied on fossil fuels such as oil, coal and gas for  energy.  Burning these fossil fuels releases the global warming gas, carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere. Other, even more potent greenhouse gasses, are also playing a role as is massive deforestation.

"The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action."-- Joint statement by 11 national science academies to world leaders (full text)

What we know

While there are still uncertainties, particularly related to the timing, extent and regional variations of climate change, there is mainstream scientific agreement on the key facts:

  • Certain gasses, such as carbon dioxide, in the atmosphere create a "greenhouse effect", trapping heat and keeping the Earth warm enough to sustain life as we know it.  
  • Burning fossil fuels (coal, oil, etc.) releases more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Although not the most potent greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide is the most significant in terms of human effects because of the large quantities emitted.
  • Carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere are now the highest in 150,000 years.  
  • The 1990's was most likely the warmest decade in history, and 1998 the warmest year.  

There is also widespread agreement that:

  • A certain amount of additional warming - about 1.3º Celsius (2.3º Fahrenheit)  compared to pre-industrial levels - is probably inevitable because of emissions so far. Limiting warming to under 2° Celsius (3.6°F) is considered vital to preventing the worst effects of global warming.
  •  If our greenhouse gas emissions are not brought under control, the speed of climate change over the next hundred years will be faster than anything known since before the dawn of civilization.
  •  There is a very real possibility that climate feedback mechanisms will result in a sudden and irreversible climate shift. No one knows how much global warming it would take to trigger such a "doomsday scenario".

Links:

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

IPCC Third assessment report

Climate Action Network (CAN) – “Preventing Dangerous Climate Change” – Position Paper (pdf)

Implications of the IPCC third assessment report – Greenpeace briefing

New Scientist magazine special climate change section


National Geographic special climate change section

The latest updates

 

Win for B.C.'s orcas!!

Blog entry by Sarah King | February 13, 2012

The countless hours spent scouring legal documents, appearing in court and enduring what must have been trying exchanges with the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) by our awesome lawyers at Ecojustice has all paid off. Read more >

We are the lucky ones at Greenpeace

Blog entry by Stephanie Goodwin | February 9, 2012

I am one of the lucky ones.  Not everyone can say that they are surrounded by greatness, passion and humour at work.  But I can.  In fact, I am regularly humbled by those around me at Greenpeace. My closest colleague for the latter... Read more >

Forest Hero: UN awards Amazon Campaign Director

Blog entry by Jess Miller | February 9, 2012

Paulo Adario, who heads up our Amazon campaign , may not be your archetypal hero (we’ve never seen him don tights), but we’re proud to announce that he has just been awarded the honour of “Forest Hero” by the UN.  He’s not one to tout... Read more >

Only half of Great Bear Rainforest off-limits to logging:

Feature story | February 7, 2012 at 10:08

Despite widespread public and political support for an agreement to save one of the world’s last and largest intact coastal temperate rainforests, only half of British Columbia’s Great Bear Rainforest is currently protected from logging. Read more >

Open Letter to Premier Christy Clark on the Implementation of the February 7, 2006...

Blog entry by Eduardo Sousa | February 7, 2012

February 7, 2012 The Hon. Christy Clark Premier, Government of British Columbia PO Box 9041 STN Prov Govt Victoria, BC V8W9E1 Dear Premier Clark: Today is the sixth anniversary of the Great Bear Rainforest Agreements... Read more >

Chasing down the truth of Harper’s “oil sands advocacy strategy”

Blog entry by Keith Stewart | January 30, 2012

I’ve spoken with a lot of politicians over the years, but I’ve never had one run away from me before. Perhaps I shouldn’t have been surprised, as it’s no secret that our federal Minister of Natural Resources doesn’t have a lot of time... Read more >

Federal government refuses to protect caribou

Blog entry by Catharine Grant, Forest Campaigner | January 27, 2012

Environment Minister Peter Kent is still refusing to issue an emergency order to protect Alberta’s woodland caribou, despite a court order last July asking him to in light of scientific evidence. Kent has suggested that the existing... Read more >

Confidential federal tar sands strategy targets Aboriginal and green groups

Feature story | January 26, 2012 at 14:34

As controversy increases over the Harper government’s attacks on environmental groups, Greenpeace Canada today released internal government documents obtained under Access to Information legislation showing that the Harper government has... Read more >

Greenpeace ad labels Asia Pulp & Paper a tiger killer

Feature story | January 23, 2012 at 9:00

Greenpeace launched an advertising campaign today illustrating the consequences of Asia Pulp & Paper’s (APP) rainforest destruction on the critically endangered Sumatran tiger in Indonesia. The tiger themed advertisement, appearing in locations... Read more >

U.S. State Department: Keystone pipeline proponents inflated jobs number 20-fold

Blog entry by Keith Stewart | January 20, 2012

There was, understandably, a lot of coverage of the Obama administration’s rejection of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline. But very few people seem to have read the full “ Report to Congress ” filed by the U.S. State Department... Read more >

1 - 10 of 2892 results.