President Obama was extended a warm Canadian welcome this morning when Greenpeace activists unveiled two large banners on the Alexandra Bridge in Ottawa that read “Welcome President Obama” and “Climate Leaders Don’t Buy Tar Sands”.
Greenpeace today condemned the Harper government for giving as
much as
$750 million dollars to nuclear energy and carbon capture and storage
instead of investing those funds in the green economy Canada needs for
the future.
Greenpeace has identified Canada as one of the main “climate villains” at the disappointing United Nations climate change conference that ran from Dec. 1 to 12 in Poznan, Poland.
The Harper government played a significant role in ensuring that the conference did not respond to the urgency of addressing global warming in Poznan.
Greenpeace is using its influence at the United Nations climate change conference in Poznan, Poland to marshal international support for its efforts to stop tar sands development and focus world attention on Canada’s refusal to make significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
The tar sands is the fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions in Canada.
Greenpeace released the Energy [R]evolution report in May 2009. It shows how Canada can make significant reductions in its greenhouse gas emissions and become a world leader in the fight against global warming.
The failure of climate change talks in Bali, Indonesia to produce hard emission reduction targets for greenhouse gases puts off for tomorrow what could have been done today, says Greenpeace Canada.
When Canada ratified the Kyoto Protocol in December 2002, it agreed to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by six per cent below 1990 levels by between 2008 and 2012. However, GHG emissions were not reduced. By the end of 2005, they had actually increased by 25 per cent above the 1990 level, and a third above our Kyoto target, placing Canada among the worst countries in the world in terms of reducing emissions.
US$180 billion. Per year. That's the massive amount of money the world could save by moving to a renewable energy future. The Future Investment report demonstrates that a safe renewable energy future would not only cut our global CO2 emissions from the electricity sector in half by 2030, it would also cost 10 times less than a ‘business as usual’ fossil-fuel future would.
The new report was agreed after almost a week of negotiations, at the end of a tense 24-hour marathon session which became increasingly political. The second of a series of four to be released throughout 2007, this report documents the widespread effects that rising temperatures are already having on ecosystems and human activities and assesses the changes projected from human induced climate change over the next century.
The Harper government’s so-called Clean Air Act (October 2006) is nothing more than ‘smog and mirrors’ — a deceptive double-speak that would in fact allow global warming emissions to increase. The climate crisis is rapidly worsening, and that crisis demands immediate action.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has officially listed the polar bear as a 'threatened' species, due to the meltdown of its sea-ice habitat caused by global warming.
Greenpeace and a coalition of environmental groups have released a report outlining how Ontario can meet the province's energy needs through a mix of clean energy and efficiency projects. In fact, energy efficiency and low-impact renewable energy sources are capable of providing twice the projected electricity needs of Canada's most populous province by 2020. No need for new nuclear plants.