Nuclear Terrorism

Page - March 21, 2007
"Nuclear terrorism is still often treated as science fiction - I wish it were. But unfortunately we live in a world of excess hazardous materials and abundant technological know-how, in which some terrorists clearly state their intention to inflict catastrophic casualties."

Plutonium shipments cross France every 7-10 days.

That's not our quote, it's UN General Secretary Kofi Annan's. He has good reason to beconcerned by the threat of nuclear terrorism. The UN's InternationalAtomic Energy Agency believe it is "far more likely" post 9/11 thatterrorists could target nuclear facilities worldwide.

Because of their importance for the electricity supply system, thesevere consequences of radioactive releases and because of theirsymbolic character, nuclear power plants are "attractive" targets forterrorist as well as for military attacks.

An attack on a nuclear facility can lead to radioactive releases equivalent to several times those released at Chernobyl.Nuclear facilities could be targets in case of war if a military use issuspected. The spectrum of possible modes of attack is very diverse.Attacks could be performed by air, on the ground and from the water. Asfurther evidence shows that more and more terrorists are consideringthe nuclear option, industry and government plans to increase thenumber of reactors globally smacks of stupidity.

Read here to find out just how mad it is:

  • Detailed plans of Britain's nuclearsites, including Sizewell, were found in a car linked to the July 2005London bombings.
  • A terrorist strike on Sellafield'sstorage tanks of radioactive waste in the UK could kill over 2 millionpeople. Due to the type of radioactive waste stored there theconsequences of an attack could dwarf the effects of the Chernobyldisaster.
  • During 2004-05 there were over fortycases of potential security breaches at UK civil nuclear sites.
  • During 2005 three suspected terroristswere caught by the Lucas Heights nuclear research reactor near Sydney,Australia.
  • A taped interview shown on Al-Jazeera TVon September 10th 2002, contained a statement that Al Qaeda initiallyplanned to include a nuclear plant in its 2001 attack sites.
  • To date, there have been six knowndirect attacks on nuclear power plants in France, South Africa,Switzerland, the Philippines, and Spain.
  • The International Policy Institute forCounter Terrorism database includes 167 terrorist incidents involving anuclear target for the period 1970-1999.

One direct consequence of the real threat of terrorist attack is thatgovernments and the nuclear industry are seeking to restrict publicaccess to information about how the industry operates. On the groundsof nuclear safety and security, less and less information is being madepublic, making it harder to scrutinize the operations of thenuclear industry.

This restriction on public information, rather than guaranteeing therewill be no terrorist attack on a nuclear facility will be sucessful (nosuch guarantee is possible) reduces the public ability to challenge the unsafeoperation of nuclear plants. Instead of destroying civil liberties,government efforts to provide real security would be better servedthrough nuclear phase-outs and investments in renewables andefficiency. A wind turbine or solar panel, unlike a nuclear facility, isnot an attractive terrorist target!

Topics