Page - February 9, 2007
The promise of abundant, affordable medicines has strong appeal, but there are serious risks to pharming, the term itself a hybrid for farming genetically engineered plants to produce pharmaceutical drugs and industrial chemicals. The problem is these drugs could end up in our cornflakes.
Like other GE plants, there is the serious risk that pharmed
plants(and animals) will cross breed with food crops. Corn in
particular,which accounts for about two-thirds of pharmaceutical
crops beingtested, has a strong tendency to cross pollinate. There
have alreadybeen several cases of contamination. In 2002 in the US,
half a millionbushels of soya for human consumption were found to
have beencontaminated by GE corn designed to produce a
transmissible stomachvirus. In both Quebec and Ontario, several
incidents were reported ofGE pigs that were being used as
bio-reactors for molecular farmingmistakenly being sent to the
slaughter house, possibly ending up onsomeone's plate as bacon or a
pork chop.
So far there have been no studies indicating that GE food poses
ahealth risk; on the other hand, there have been no studies on
thelong-term effects of GE food on human health. However, pharma
cropsraise the stakes as they are designed to specifically target
aphysiological function in humans.
"Are Canadians, consumers and farmers, here and abroad, willing
toaccept having their food supply contaminated by industrial
andpharmaceutical organisms?" Greenpeace wrote to ask the Canadian
primeminister. We think not.
Greenpeace urged the prime minister to prevent the release in
Canadaof GE plants designed for pharming, warning of the danger
posed to theenvironment and its natural biodiversity, the food
chain and theability of Canadian farmers to sell their crops in
overseas markets.
The prime minister was reminded of the very worrying
conclusionsreached by the auditor general in her 2004 report
concerning theCanadian Food Inspection Agency, which regulates GE
crops. The agencywas criticized for deficiencies in procedures for
determining whetheror not to release GE plants. According to the
auditor general, "theagency did not have complete documentary
evidence and therefore, wasnot transparent about how it was
evaluating the long-term effects onthe environment before
authorizing unconfined release of plants withnovel traits."
Greenpeace believes that no food plants or animals should be
used inthe production of pharmaceuticals. Moreover, there is no
excuse forallowing drug producing crops to be grown out in the
fields where theycan contaminate the environment and food chain by
spreading their genesto wild relatives and to conventional crops
growing nearby. Thesepharmaceuticals can be produced in other ways.
The industry's pitch forcheap drugs is an empty promise as pharmed
crops will be patentedallowing the companies that own them to
charge high prices. Thesepatents ensure that the any benefits from
pharming will go the drugcompanies, not patients.