The United Nations plays a key role in coordinating the international response to climate change. But it is no simple job getting cooperation and agreement from the 191 member states of the UN - all intent on pursuing their own self interests and policies - even when the evidence is clearly shows that failing to act would be disastrous for all.
The two UN institutions that deal most directly with climate change are
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the UN
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The first
provides scientific and technical advice to policy makers, and the
second develops policy mechanisms to deal with climate change.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
The
IPCC was established in 1988 by
the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP). At the time it was recognised that
climate change was a serious issue, and that world leaders would need
unbiased scientific advice - independent of national interests and
corporate influence.
The role of the IPCC is to advise policy makers about the current state
of knowledge and provide reliable information pertaining to climate
change. It does not conduct any scientific research itself, but
instead reviews the thousands of papers on climate change published in
the peer reviewed literature every year and summarises the ‘state of
knowledge’ on climate change in Assessment Reports which are published
every five years or so. About 1,000 experts from all over the
world were involved in drafting the most recent, the Third Assessment
Report (2001), and about 2,500 were involved in its review. The Fourth
Assessment Report, well under way now, is due to be published in 2007.
The IPCC also publishes a variety of other reports on request of
governments, intergovernmental organisations or international treaties.
The IPCC is broken down into three working groups. The first
working group "assesses the scientific aspects of the climate system
and climate change". That is, it reports on what we know about
climate change - if it is happening, why it is happening and how fast
it is happening. The second working group " assesses the
vulnerability of socio-economic and natural systems to climate change,
negative and positive consequences of climate change, and options for
adapting to it". That is, it looks at what degree climate
change will impact people and the environment, and what changes might
reduce its impacts. The third working group "assesses options for
limiting greenhouse gas emissions and otherwise mitigating climate
change." That is, it examines ways we can stop human caused
climate change, or at least slow it down.
Greenpeace relies heavily on IPCC reports as the basis for its international climate campaign.
See the
Scientific Consensus page for a brief overview of the IPCC's latest conclusions.
Read in
more detail about the IPCC's most recent assessment.
Visit the
IPCC's own website for the full text of the Third Assessment Report.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
The
UNFCCC
was agreed at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992, and
has since been ratified by 189 countries. Its ultimate objective:
"[The] stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere
at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with
the climate system. Such a level should be achieved within a time-frame
sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to
ensure that food production is not threatened and to enable economic
development to proceed in a sustainable manner."
The Convention then goes on to say:
“The Parties should protect the climate system for the benefit of
present and future generations of humankind, on the basis of equity and
in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities and
respective capabilities. Accordingly, the developed country Parties
should take the lead in combating climate change and the adverse
affects thereof.”
(
Full text of the Convention)
The UNFCCC is, as its name implies, a ‘framework’ convention, and needs
subsidiary legal instruments (e.g. protocols) to effect its goals. It
has a non-binding target, which calls for industrialised countries to
bring their emissions back to 1990 levels by 2000. However, it
was obviously by 1995 that these voluntary targets were
inadequate. Realizing the need for another approach, in
1995 the Parties to the Convention established a process to negotiate a
protocol with binding targets and timetables “as a matter of urgency”.
The result was the Kyoto Protocol, which was agreed in December of 1997
and finally entered into force on February 16, 2005.
The annual meetings of the Convention are called Conferences of the
Parties (COPs). These meetings continue, and are attended by
government officials, industry lobbyists, Greenpeace and many other
groups. Most of the Parties are genuinely seeking a way forward,
looking even beyond Kyoto, but there are always those with huge vested
interests in the continuation of the fossil fuel industry - such as
representatives of the Bush administration and the OPEC countries –
whose main goal is to cripple the convention and generally
prevent any true progress on the issue.
You can read first hand accounts from these meetings, along with
Greenpeace position papers and other relevant documents on our
International Negotiations page.