You Are Here:
When electronic goods are thrown away they end up in landfulls or incinerators or dumped in a developing country, such as China.
Landfill: When electonic products are dumped in lanfdills, toxic chemicals in electronics products can leach into the
land over time or are released into the atmosphere.
In many European countries,
regulations have been introduced to prevent electronic waste being
dumped in landfills due to its hazardous content.
However, the practice
still continues in many countries.
In Hong Kong for example, it is
estimated that 10-20 percent of discarded computers go to landfill.
Incineration: This releases
heavy metals such as lead, cadmium and mercury into the air and ashes.
Mercury released into the atmosphere can bioaccumulate in the food
chain, particularly in fish - the major route of exposure for the
general public.
If the products contain PVC plastic, highly toxic
dioxins and furans are also released. Brominated flame retardants
generate brominated dioxins and furans when e-waste is burned.
Reuse: A good way to increase a
product's lifespan.
Many old products are exported to developing
countries.
Although the benefits of reusing electronics in this way are
clear, the practice is causing serious problems because the old
products are dumped after a short period of use in areas that are
unlikely to have hazardous waste facilities.
Recycle: Although recycling can
be a good way to reuse the raw materials in a product, the hazardous
chemicals in e-waste mean that electronics can harm workers in the
recycling yards, as well as their neighbouring communities and
environment.
In developed countries, electronics recycling takes place in
purpose-built recycling plants under controlled conditions.
In many EU
states for example, plastics from e-waste are not recycled to avoid
brominated furans and dioxins being released into the atmosphere.
In
developing countries however, there are no such controls. Recycling is
done by hand in scrap yards, often by children.
Export: E-waste is
routinely exported by developed countries to developing ones, often in
violation of the international law.
Mainland China tried to prevent this trade by banning the import of
e-waste in 2000.
However, we have discovered that the laws are not
working; e-waste is still arriving in Guiya of Guangdong Province, the
main centre of e-waste scrapping in China.
We have also found a growing e-waste trade problem in India.
25,000
workers are employed at scrap yards in Delhi alone, where 10-20000
tonnes of e-waste is handled each year, 25 percent of this being
computers.
Other e-waste scrap yards have been found in Meerut,
Ferozabad, Chennai, Bangalore and Mumbai.
How did the trade evolve?
In the 1990s, governments in the EU, Japan and some US states set up
e-waste 'recycling' systems. But many countries did not have the
capacity to deal with the sheer quantity of e-waste they generated or
with its hazardous nature.
Therefore, they began exporting the problem to developing countries
where laws to protect workers and the environment are inadequate or not
enforced.
It is also cheaper to 'recycle' waste in developing
countries; the cost of glass-to-glass recycling of computer monitors in
the US is ten times more than in China.
Demand in Asia for electronic waste began to grow when scrap yards
found they could extract valuable substances such as copper, iron,
silicon, nickel and gold, during the recycling process.
A mobile phone,
for example, is 19 percent copper and eight percent iron.