Greenpeace issues a joint statement together with the fruit and vegetables industry, consumer groups, legislators and
political parties (
Appendix 1), urging the Government for the timetable for
food safety legislation, so as to strengthen Hong Kong food safety monitoring system.
Heath, Welfare and Food Bureau responded that the Government is drafting a comprehensive set of Food
Safety Legislation, which will cover high risk and most concerned food. Yet,
the legislative progress announced in the legislative council before includes
fishes and eggs only, vegetables legislation timetable is still absent. Chow Yuen-ping, Assistant Campaigner of Food Safety, Greenpeace points
out, "Fishes, eggs, plus
fruit and vegetables safety are all our staple food and the legislation
progress should be done simultaneously.”
Greenpeace indicts that no improvement has been made since the group
first reported pesticide found in vegetables a year ago. They have been closely
monitoring the regulation effort of Government on vegetables, and conducted
another round of testing by collecting 20 samples from various districts across
Hong Kong early this year (
Appendix 2). According
to the testing results, 4 samples are found to be contaminated by banned
pesticide or pesticide residues exceeding standard, including highly toxic
banned pesticide Carbofuran found on a Dutch bean sample. One small pak choi
sample also contains pesticide residue exceeding EU standard for 4.4 times. The
result is deemed as a clear indication of the zero improvement of the food
safety in Hong Kong throughout the year.
In addition, Greenpeace presents evidence of data manipulation by the FEHD Man Kam To Food Control Office. According to the department's report of the
performance pledge, a total of more than 20,000 vehicles carrying vegetables
were inspected by the Man Kam To Food Control Office in 2006, equivalent to
100% of all passing vegetable lorries (
Appendix 3). However, the group has made
on-site documentary in which a great number of lorries loaded with vegetables
simply bypassed the Man Kam To Food Control Office, where vegetable lorries are
supposed to undergo
pesticide residue inspection.
Chow Yuen-ping, Assistant Campaigner of Food Safety, Greenpeace points
out, "FEHD vegetable inspection at the border is obviously useless. The
figure from FEHD is misleading the public! The results repeatedly show that the Government
simply has no effective policy to guarantee the vegetable safety in Hong Kong.”
While the Mainland authority has already implemented a series of new
measures to improve vegetable supply control since 1st April this
year, the Hong Kong Government has no corresponding legislation on regulating
imports of fruit and vegetables. The passive and impotent Hong Kong Government
effectively fails all of Hong Kong people in
securing food safety.
Food Safety Expert Committee and the Legislative Council's motion in
January this year, however, have made it clear that comprehensive food safety legislation is undoubtedly urgent. Yet in the name of
research and consultation, no real progress has been made by the government, concrete legislation timetable is still absent. As a
result, food safety crisis is still haunting the city as a whole (
Appendix 4).
In view of this, Greenpeace aligned the production and trade sectors in the fruit and vegetables industry, consumer groups and
community representatives, jointly fire a demand for speeding up the
legislation of food safety. Activists from Greenpeace will hand the "Joint
statement on legislating for safe fruit and vegetables" to York Chow, head
of Heath, Welfare and Food Bureau, to call upon the Government to prompt the
legislation process on food safety.
"Greenpeace for sure will keep watching our food safety. As long as the Government does not publicly announce the
timetable for legislation, ignoring the health of the public in an apathetic
manner, the possibility of escalating the level of action will not be ruled
out." Chow warned.