Brussels, Belgium — The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) missed an opportunity today to recover its credibility as regulator of GMO authorisations in Europe.
Brussels, Belgium — New research into the health impacts of genetically engineered (GE) food already approved in Europe casts further doubt on the way these products are checked for safety by EU authorities before being approved for sale and...
A Greenpeace critique on the workings of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
The current EU GMO authorisation process is affected by a fundamental problem. In breach of legal requirements, the authorisations are based exclusively on the opinions (all positive to date) of a single EU body, the European Food...
Genetic Engineering Briefing Pack
The European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) opinion on the environmental and human effects of the cultivation of the genetically modified (GM) maize variety MON810 is woefully inadequate and ignores the social consequences of production.
Case studies and lessons learnt from the European Food Safety Authority's risk assessment of applications for genetically modified organisms.
Greenpeace Technical comments on EFSA’s opinion on NK603 x MON810.
Renewed Aggression by a Rogue State
A Greenpeace technical critique of EFSA Opinion on genetically modified maize NK603 for import and processing under Directive 2001/18/EC and Regulation 258/97
1 - 10 of 54 results.
The Greenpeace Google Search will also return results form http://archive.greenpeace.org - Greenpeace’s archive of web content dating back to 1994, along with content from those few Greenpeace websites not shared on this.