“The EU must ensure that a flexibility mechanism helps rather than hampers the 20% target. We do not want a situation where a few giant companies can profit from trading, while increasing costs for European consumers and jeopardising the EU’s ambition to develop clean energy,” said Frauke Thies, Greenpeace EU renewable energy campaigner.

Greenpeace supports any flexibility mechanism where member states can trade renewable credits once they have reached their national targets, but believes that trading between companies, rather that states, could spell the end for successful support measures for renewable energy. With growing evidence proving the unsustainability of most biofuels, Greenpeace also urges ministers to drop the 10% renewable sub-target for the transport sector.

Negotiations are still ongoing on whether ministers will endorse the separation of energy network ownership from energy supply, also known as unbundling. ”Greenpeace endorses the Commission’s proposal for full ownership unbundling and the establishment of a level playing field, while underlining the need for a strong European regulator,” said Thies. “We reject attempts by certain member states and big business to hold on to de-facto monopolies that create unfair market conditions for new operators, such as renewable energy providers,” she added.

European ministers are also still discussing about the focus of energy-related technological research for the coming years. “The Strategic Energy Technology (SET) Plan should exclude support for expensive technologies that bear an unacceptable environmental cost, such as nuclear energy, and that are mere distractions, like carbon capture and storage,” said Thies. “The SET Plan cannot effectively promote an innovative and sustainable energy system based on efficiency, renewables and smart energy grid operation, while at the same time perpetuating an outdated centralised energy model.”(2)