Environmental impacts

The nuclear power park proposed for Jaitapur, Maharashtra, will be the largest in the world at a single site. The project will cause huge and harmful environmental impacts, yet the risks have not been properly assessed.

The land assigned to the Jaitapur Nuclear Power Plant is 938 hecatres of the Madban plateau, in Ratnigiri district of Maharashtra.  This lateritic plateau is one of the world’s ecological and biodiversity ‘hot-spots,’ a rich grassy plain sloping down to glittering coastline in the lush region of Konkan, south-west India.  The Environmental Impact Assessment report for the Jaitapur plant has termed this land as “rocky with poor fertility” and “barren,” conveniently paving the way for construction. This is a lie. 

Madban’s rich biodiversity spans moist deciduous and semi-evergreen forests, open scrubs, mangrove forests and coastal and creek waters.  It is a unique and highly delicate ecosystem, in which all species exist in a fine and integrated balance.  Constructing a nuclear power plant there will destroy its natural wealth.

What is an Environmental Impact Assessment?

Proposed projects in India require environmental clearances from the Ministry of Environment and Forests, and this includes any new nuclear power projects.  Clearances are based on the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report.  However, there are a lot of problems with the EIA process that prevents it from being an objective evaluation, particularly in the case of nuclear power projects.

EIAs are prepared by independent consultants, but the data they use on background radiation and how much radioactive material is expected to be released is provided to them by the nuclear establishment.  This removes any assurance of impartial evaluation of radiation exposure around nuclear power plants. The assessment of the risk from radioactivity - the singular largest concern for nuclear power projects - is also admitted to be outside of the expertise of the environment ministry, and so performed by the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, or AERB.  While the AERB is the designated safety regulator for all nuclear matters in India, their ability to deliver this mandate is severely compromised by the fact that it is provided technical staff by the Department of Atomic Energy.

After the written report, the EIA process has two further components: a public consultation and an appraisal by a committee of experts.  Both these processes are often heavily biased towards the nuclear establishment.  Concerns raised by the public are glibly dismissed, responded to with simplistic answers that insult the intelligence of those posing the questions, or sometimes simply ignored.  Members of the apparently objective committee of experts, charged with making a final decision on whether a project should be cleared or not, are often sourced from within the nuclear establishment that they are supposed to be assessing.

The impact of reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, one of the most highly radioactive and therefore dangerous steps of the nuclear fuel chain, is exempt from EIA reports in India.

 The Jaitapur EIA

The Ministry of Environment and Forests has issued legally binding guidelines for EIAs on nuclear facilities.  The Jaitapur EIA ignores or glosses over many of these.  For others, it presents data and conclusions which are simply wrong.

Crucial areas that  the Jaitapur EIA report fails to assess to any satisfactory level include:

  • Impacts of routine radiological releases on people and environment.
  • The possibility of an accident, or impacts of a large radiological release.
  • Health impacts of routine emissions for the estimated 1000 site workers, despite an 5% increased risk of cancer.
  • The chequered history of the European Pressurised Reactor, of which no examples are in operation anywhere in the world.
  • Impacts the 938-hectare-plant will have on livelihoods, land ecosystems and marine ecosystems.
  • How the plant will be decommissioned at the end of its life and what environmental impact that process will have.
  • How high-level radioactive waste will be disposed of or how it will contaminate the environment.
  • Fails to consider any alternatives for either site or technology.

It’s a sloppy report, with mistakes and contradictions even from one page to the next.

The public consultation for Jaitapur was held in May 2010 under the watchful eye of a large police force: hardly an atmosphere for comfortable and democratic protest. Protocol dictates that the EIA must be distributed at least a month in advance to all affected villages in the local language, which in this case would be Marathi.

Yet the Marathi EIA for Jaitapur was handed to only one of the five villages that fall in the proposed plant site, and only four days before the hearing.  Hardly sufficient time to analyse a 1200-page document on the environmental impacts of unknown nuclear technology in your neighbourhood. 

 

Sources
Environmental Impact Assessment for Proposed Jaitapur Nuclear Power Park, Village Madban, District Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, prepared by National Environmental Engneering Research Institute, Vol 1, Ch 1, p. 7

A Nuclear Enron?  Frontline magazine, Vol 28 Issue 03, Jan 29-Feb 11, 2011, Praful Bidwai

The Environmental Impact Assessment  Process for Nuclear Facilities: An examination of the Indian Experience, M. V. Ramana, 2009. http://princeton.academia.edu/MVRamana/Papers/264402/The_environmental_impact_assessment_process_for_nuclear_facilities_An_examination_of_the_Indian_experience

Report on visit to the proposed site of nuclear power plant, Jaitapur, Bombay Natural History Society.

Environmental Impact Assessment Notification - 2006, Ministry of Environment and Forests

2010 Environmental Impact Assessment Guidance Manual for Nuclear Power Plants, Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Plants and Nuclear Waste Management Plants, Ministry of Environment and Forests

The latest updates

 

Lights! Dharnai! Action!

Blog entry by Somdatta Sengupta | July 18, 2014

After sunset, the stage is set for all Dharnai folks to come together for a chat, friendly banter or neighbourly meet-up Dharnai, Bihar — Times are changing. No longer do women in Dharnai rush to get dinner ready before dark. No...

Say Hello To Green Teams!

Blog entry by Kanchi Dave | July 18, 2014

Green Teams is a project by Greenpeace aimed at educating students under 16 about the environment and the issues it's facing. Our first program was at Shama Vidya Shala. It was a week-long awareness session for students from 1st to...

Quality Defines Success in Dharnai

Blog entry by Anand Prabu Pathanjali | July 16, 2014

The success of a microgrid largely depends on the quality of components used right from the generation, transmission and storage. For example, in the microgird installed at Dharnai, we have used a grade A solar panel with the...

Forged Gram Sabha Complaint: Jabalpur HC Takes Singrauli SP to Task

Feature story | July 16, 2014 at 16:06

The issue of the forged signatures in the Gram Sabha resolution has received a boost from the Jabalpur High Court. The HC has pulled up the Superintendent of Police of Singrauli for not taking action on the complaint filed by the villagers on the...

Voice of the Environment!

Blog entry by Manish Kumar | July 16, 2014

Over the past year, I have been working as a face-to-face fundraiser at Greenpeace. I am part of a passionate group of people, both young and old, men and women, who spend day after day on the streets of India, speaking to strangers...

Dharnai Live Microgrid Media Manual

Publication | July 15, 2014 at 13:54

Greenpeace's energy access campaign in Bihar. A detailed manual consisting of all the information on the decentralised solar microgrid installed by Greenpeace India in Dharnai revenue village, Jehanabad district, Bihar

Dharnai Live - Microgrid Technical Fact Sheet

Publication | July 12, 2014 at 17:53

A technical know-how of the decentralized solar microgrid. Find out the details on energy generated, specification of the microgrid spread about in clusters in Dharnai, Jehanabad district, Bihar, India

Dharnai Live Briefing Paper

Publication | July 12, 2014 at 12:15

Enabling energy access through smart microgrids based on renewable energy technologies in the state of Bihar, India

Stop Muzzling Voices of Dissent!

Feature story | July 11, 2014 at 14:07

It has been said that dissent is the highest form of patriotism. However, the arbitrary manner in which the government has attempted to muzzle voices of dissent in democracy in the name of financial scrutiny seems to indicate the exact opposite.

Dharnai: Going LIVE on July 20

Feature story | July 10, 2014 at 17:15

Several decades have passed since India became an independent country, but several million of its citizens still live in darkness. The centralised grid system has failed to live up to the hopes and aspirations of the people, with those in rural...

71 - 80 of 2118 results.