Safety

…the possibility, however remote it may be, of human error, systems failure, sabotage, earthquake and terrorist attacks leading to the release of radioactive matter in the public domain, cannot be entirely ruled out.

 

Guidelines on Management of Nuclear and Radiological Emergencies

National Disaster Management Authority

Govt of India

All nuclear power plants are inherently dangerous.  They are vulnerable to any combination of natural disaster, human error or design failure.  In India, institutional faults make that risk a little bit greater.  Yet these dangers are routinely and emphatically downplayed by the nuclear establishment.

There’s a myth propagated that nuclear power has become safer in recent years.  It’s now toted as the answer to climate change – an “environmentally-friendly” option that guides us away from the looming crisis of peak oil.  The truth is that even a significant increase in nuclear power would only lead to a negligible CO2 reduction 1, and that nuclear reactors are no safer than they were in the 20th Century.  If anything, as they become more powerful, the possible consequences of an accident become even more terrible.

Mistakes do happen.  The nuclear sector is replete with chilling stories of incidents, accidents and near misses.  There’s a story or more for every day of the year - all 365 of them.2 Accidents happened before Chernobyl.  They happened after Chernobyl.  Only the explanations and excuses get tailored anew each time.  The industry is known to have manipulated safety and inspection data, in certain cases, in order to avoid costly repairs and lengthy shutdowns.3 The secrecy that blankets the Indian nuclear power sector shields it further.

Yet even under normal operations nuclear power plants regularly discharge radioactive materials into the air and water.  Nuclear waste, the deadly by-product of nuclear power for which there is no real long-term solution, remains radioactive for generations.

Proponents of nuclear power want it discussed and evaluated on the same factors as other methods of power generation.   This can only be done if the risk factor is set aside altogether as being irrelevant, if the horrific, long-lasting consequences of an accident on huge populations is considered an acceptable price to pay. At Greenpeace, we don’t think it is.

Alternative power sources exist, such as solar, wind or micro-hydro energy.  They can be combined with energy efficiency to deliver India’s electricity needs, fast.  They won’t exacerbate climate change like fossil fuels, and nor do they leave a radioactive legacy or carry the unacceptable risk of a radiological accident, like nuclear energy.  India needs to stop gambling with the health of our children and our land by investing in nuclear power.



Sources
1 Energy Technology Perspectives 2010, IEA/OECD, June 2010
2 http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/publications/reports/nuclearaccidentscalendar/
3 “Complacency, negligence threaten nuclear industry, WANO warns". Nucleonics Week, vol. 44/ Issue 42, Oct. 16,2003

The latest updates

 

Greenpeace activists from Germany join the

Image | December 2, 2004 at 4:30

Greenpeace activists from Germany join the global day of action.

Destination Unknown

Publication | December 1, 2004 at 4:30

According to new research by Greenpeace (section 2), EU+1 countries bear a great responsibility, as either ‘flag’ state or country of ownership, for up to 29% of all single hull oil tankers (by DWT2) subject to the global phase out regulations...

Farmers say NO to pesticides - Public Hearing at Yavatmal, Maharashtra.

Feature story | November 29, 2004 at 4:30

MUMBAI, India — About 50 farmers gathered at a public hearing on pesticides organised by Greenpeace India at Sunna village, Pandarakavda, Yavatmal District, along with local NGO’s and concerned citizens. An intense discussion followed, on the...

Bhopal disaster - twenty years on II

Feature story | November 26, 2004 at 4:30

BHOPAL/MICHIGAN, India — Imagine waking up one morning to find that dangerous chemicals have contaminated your home and community, and that the culprits are ignoring your plight. That is the reality that both Paul and Ruby faced at a very early...

estrip

Image | November 25, 2004 at 5:30

estrip

Toxins in your TV, poisons in your PC?

Feature story | November 22, 2004 at 4:30

Toxic chemicals found in products like home electronics are polluting environments across the globe and traces of which are found in most newborn babies. Discover the good companies removing these poisons from their products and pressure the bad...

Children of Cotton Communities Poisoned by Pesticides - Public Hearing in Raichur,...

Feature story | November 20, 2004 at 4:30

BANGALORE, India — Over 100 farmers, organic farming enthusiasts and development activists gathered to discuss the alarming findings of a nation wide Greenpeace study on the impact of pesticides on the development of children.

Participants at the public hearing at Raichur

Image | November 20, 2004 at 4:30

Participants at the public hearing at Raichur, Karnataka

Panellists at the public hearing

Image | November 20, 2004 at 4:30

Panellists at the public hearing, Raichur

Letter from the Sarpanch to the Chief Minister

Publication | November 19, 2004 at 4:30

1751 - 1760 of 2098 results.