Can the authorities be trusted?

Post the nuclear crisis in Fukushima, Indian authorities have come out in full force to defend the country’s plan for aggressive nuclear expansion.  Heads of various nuclear agencies, both past and present, have joined the Prime Minister in a vociferous chorus on the extraordinary safety credentials of India’s nuclear facilities.  

Can we really trust these reassurances?

 

Dr. Anil Kakodkar

Former Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission and Secretary of Department of Atomic Energy (2000-2009), former Director of Bhabha Atomic Research Centre.
Address to Members of the Legislative Assembly and Members of the Legislative Council of Maharashtra.
14th March, Press Trust of India


Statement: "Compared to Japan, seismic activity is very less in India. In Japan, there are fifty-four reactors in seismic zone four and five. In USA, there are ten reactors in seismic zone five. While Jaitapur is in seismic zone three."

 Reality:

  • Narora Atomic Power Station (with two 220 MW capacity reactors) in Bulandshar district of Uttar Pradesh  is, by the NPCIL’s own admission, situated in a seismic zone four.
  • Documents obtained from the Geological Survey of India under the Right To Information Act of 2005 clearly place Ratnagiri district as a seismic zone four, not zone three. The Environmental Impact Assessment of Jaitapur nuclear power plant states the project to be in Ratnigiri district. This is a clear disjuncture between various assertions by the government.

 

Statement:He also said that countries such as Germany, Italy and Sweden, which had decided not to have nuclear power plants, later had a rethink. 

Reality:

  • On the same day, German chancellor Angela Merkel announced a moratorium on the country's nuclear plants, including a permanent shutdown of 7 reactors.
  • On 23rd March, Italy's Council of Ministers approved a moratorium of at least one year on construction of nuclear power plants in the country, which had been looking to restart its long-abandoned nuclear program.  
  • Switzerland suspended the approvals process for three new nuclear power stations.
  • EU energy commissioner, Guenther Oettinger, moved quickly to try to forge a pan-European response to having a single European nuclear policy. It’s an area where the European Commission has rarely intervened in the past.

Kakodkar is no longer making references to Europe to support his own views, as there is clearly little basis for his assurances. More country reactions to the Fukushima disaster can be seen here.

 

Statement:When asked by a member of the audience as to why solar energy can not be an alternative, he said solar energy was important but it was not available 24 hours and was not economically viable.  Nuclear power plants required less land, compared to solar energy projects, Kakodkar explained.

Reality:

  • The installed capacity of grid-connected renewable energy sources in India is currently 18455 MW, nearly four times the installed capacity of nuclear power (4780 MW).
  • Kakodkar fails to mention other renewable energy options such as offshore wind, tidal or small hydro power, all of which take up very little land.  Similarly, no mention is made of the significant potential of improved energy efficiency measures.
  • The variability of renewable energy is no disadvantage if many small-scale generating stations are installed on a flexible grid system.  Large, centralised power stations are no longer needed.  All power plants fail, and the breakdown of a large scale generating station - such as a nuclear plant - will both remove far more power from a grid, and take far longer to start up again.  

 

Dr. S. K. Jain

Chairman and Managing Director, Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited
14th March, Press Trust of India


Statement:Regarding the French EPR reactors which are proposed for Jaitapur plant in Ratnagiri district, Bannerjee [Chairman, AEC] and Jain said the design of EPR was based on the design experience of 58 reactors running in Europe, and when the Indian EPR will come up it would have seen the experience of five such similar plants in Finland, France, China and UK.

Reality:

  • Not a single EPR reactor has yet been built, let alone operates, anywhere in the world.
  • Reactors under construction in Finland and in France are years over schedule and way over budget. There is little information available on the relatively new construction site in China. The UK plant construction has not yet begun. 
  • The government has said early construction is planned for the Jaitapur reactors.  Even if other EPRs begin operating before the Jaitapur EPR is complete, there is little opportunity for their experience to modify the design of the power plant in India.

 

Statement:Jain said India was uniquely placed as it had a centralised emergency operating centre with well drawn procedures scrutinised by regulators.

Reality:

  • A nuclear regulator should be an independent authority, yet the institutional structure in India compromises the ability of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) to be so.
  • The AERB must regulate and monitor the activities of the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) and report to the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC).  Yet the secretary of the DAE is also the chairman of the AEC.
  • The AERB is not even housed in a separate building - it has office space within the DAE premises.

 

Empty promises

It’s not just in India.  The two worst nuclear accidents in history were also preceded (and followed!) by reassurances of safety.

Chernobyl
1983 - “The design feature [of the RBMK reactor - that used in Chernobyl] of having more than 1000 individual primary circuits increases the safety of the reactor system - a serious loss-of-coolant accident is practically impossible.” B. Semenov, Deputy Director General, IAEA Department of Nuclear Energy and Safety (IAEA BULLETIN, VOL. 25, No.2 (1983) p.51)

1986 - Chernobyl nuclear disaster, an accident involving a loss of coolant. The worst nuclear accident to date, and the only one classified as level 7 on the INES scale, the IAEA’s scale of severity for nuclear events.


Fukushima
January 2011 - “Even for a nuclear plant situated very close to sea level, the robust sealed containment structure around the reactor itself would prevent any damage to the nuclear part from a tsunami, though other parts of the plant might be damaged. No radiological hazard would be likely.”
(World Nuclear Association, www.world-nuclear.org)

January 2011 - “Nuclear facilities are designed so that earthquakes and other external events will not jeopardise the safety of the plant. In France for instance, nuclear plants are designed to withstand an earthquake twice as strong as the 1000-year event calculated for each site. It is estimated that, worldwide, 20% of nuclear reactors are operating in areas of significant seismic activity.” (World Nuclear Association, www.world-nuclear.org)

8 January 2011 - In promoting Japan’s nuclear wares to Saudi Arabia, Japanese Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Akihiro Ohata says that Japanese nuclear programs are “the world’s safest”.

11 March 2011 - An offshore earthquake measuring 8.9 on the Richter scale, followed by a tsunami, creates an emergency situation at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.  Radioactive material is released into the environment.  The scale of the crisis is still unfolding.

28 March 2011 - “The up-to-date reactors are fully protected, and if such reactor is taken to the Fukushima location (though, I have mentioned that a few human creations are capable of withstanding a disaster of that force), an up-to-date reactor is capable of withstanding this.” Sergei Kirienko, Director of Federal Atomic Energy Agency (Rosatom), Russia

The latest updates

 

What a Sunday!

Blog entry by Shubhra Chaturvedi | July 13, 2017

Sundays are my favourite days, and not for the same reason as most of you. I work 7 days a week, 24 hours a day and I couldn't have been more happy. I quit my corporate job a year and half ago and followed my heart that resided in...

The Solar House On Wheels Is Here!

Blog entry by Mahima Chauhan | June 28, 2017

It’s June and it’s bright and sunny at 37 degrees. Something unusual is doing the rounds in the streets of Delhi. The Solar house on wheels has made Delhi folks curious and quite keen on pursuing solar for their rooftops . Could...

Going Solar - A Great Investment Plan

Blog entry by Pujarini Sen | June 19, 2017

India is emerging as a world leader in solar. As the third largest solar market globally 1 , a market that is growing by 90%, making the potential of solar in our country quite tremendous. Prime Minister Modi inaugurated the...

Pipe dreams Treated sewage will not solve coal power’s water problems

Publication | June 13, 2017 at 15:59

Water shortages and regional droughts have become more pronounced in India. Following below par monsoons in 2015 and the subsequent country wide drought in early 2016, water shortages for coal power generation became acute and several plants were...

Sounds of Nature: From Petrichor to Pollution

Blog entry by Greenpeace India | June 6, 2017

In this day and age of videos, GIFs, and tweets: sometimes we forget to 'listen'. Visuals give us an entire new angle to a story, but so does sound, and more importantly - voices.  I grew up listening to RJs babbling on FM channels...

Sun – The Ultimate Source Of Our Energy

Blog entry by Ravi Chellam | June 5, 2017

I have a close and personal relationship with the Sun.  I am named after him as I was born on a Sunday! The Sun is an infinite (at least in terms of human time scales) and renewable source of energy which is also by far the most...

Top Four Reasons You Should Go Solar

Blog entry by Grace Saji | June 2, 2017

1. Get paid  Image: media.tumblr Sell some of that electricity and get credited! 1 If you haven’t already heard about net metering, voila! Get your solar rooftop system connected to the main grid.  If you end up using lesser...

8 problems with the GM Mustard commercialisation shown in GIF

Blog entry by Grace Saji | May 30, 2017

1. India signed the Cartagena Protocol* aiming to protect biodiversity and provide biosafety in 2003, but now, is keen to give the go ahead to GM Mustard (straight road to monoculture) Image: commentphotos   2. Right from...

6 Funny Memes on Coal Power Companies' reactions to Truths

Blog entry by Grace Saji | May 26, 2017

1. Solar power is cheaper than power from a new coal plant. So there is no need for new coal power plants Image: kym-cdn 2. Solar expansion will disrupt coal power! The competition of solar power is so high that it could...

A Call From The Deep Blue

Blog entry by Shivani Shah | April 24, 2017

Take a deep breath. Every second breath you take comes from the oceans. Oceans cover over 70 percent of the expanse on Earth and afford shelter to a multitude of lifeforms with whom we have the privilege to share this tiny blue dot we...

1 - 10 of 3917 results.