Nuclear accidents in India

An independent regulatory board is supposed to be protecting the health of people and environment, not the nuclear establishment.  So why isn’t it?

The secrecy that shrouds the civilian nuclear industry in India makes it almost impossible for citizens to know accurately the details of accidents that have occurred, or indeed sometimes whether accidents have occurred at all.  Yet the sector teems with rumours and eyewitness accounts of near-misses, leaks, cracks, radiation exposures and safety violations.

The costs paid by Indian citizens, in both health and environment, seem to be far greater than the meager 2.7% of electricity currently provided by India’s civilian nuclear sector (1).  An even greater injustice is that it is often the same factions of society - the nameless day labourers who are not educated in the dangers of radiation - that are brought in to clear up the mess, as are then overlooked when it comes to distributing reliable supplies of electricity.

The frequency and similarity of many of these incidents and accidents is disturbing.  It discredits the Department of Atomic Energy as the head of a nuclear industry, and the ability of the AERB to ensure safety in that industry.

Read about some accidents at nuclear power plants in India dating back to 1991 here.

In addition to all nuclear power facilities the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) must also ensure the safety of India’s 52,000-plus radiological facilities.  These include medical institutions, industrial uses, and research facilities, and safety violations happen at them, too.  The most serious incident to date is Mayapuri in 2010, in which a cobalt-60 source was sold and taken apart in a scrapyard, killing one man and hospitalising seven others.


Notes
1 As of April 2011. Central Electricity Authority http://www.cea.nic.in/

The latest updates

 

Summary of greenpeace response to allegations from north Orissa university and...

Publication | July 6, 2007 at 12:20

1. Greenpeace stands by the report as published and reiterates call to stop work on Dhamra Port. 2. The complete report as published had the prior informed consent of the North Orissa University (NOU)

Email exchange on report

Publication | July 6, 2007 at 12:02

Dead turtles

Image | July 6, 2007 at 11:39

Dead turtles, probable victims of mechanised fishing, on the site of the TATA port at Dhamra.

Dead turtles

Image | July 6, 2007 at 11:39

Dead turtles, probable victims of mechanised fishing, on the site of the TATA port at Dhamra.

Dead turtles

Image | July 6, 2007 at 11:39

Dead turtles, probable victims of mechanised fishing, on the site of the TATA port at Dhamra.

Flood ravaged victims in Navsari

Image | July 6, 2007 at 3:30

Flood ravaged victims in Navsari, Gujarat holding a Greenpeace banner acknowledging the fact that severe flooding is an effect of climate change.

Flood ravaged victims in Navsari

Image | July 6, 2007 at 3:30

Flood ravaged victims in Navsari, Gujarat holding a Greenpeace banner acknowledging the fact that severe flooding is an effect of climate change.

Flood ravaged victims in Navsari

Image | July 6, 2007 at 3:30

Flood ravaged victims in Navsari, Gujarat holding a Greenpeace banner acknowledging the fact that severe flooding is an effect of climate change.

dbt_decision

Publication | July 3, 2007 at 17:40

Communication under compliance of the CIC decision on case No. CIC/WB/ A/ 2006/ 00548, from the Dept. of Biotechnology to Divya Raghunandan, Greenpeace.

Market Report

Publication | July 3, 2007 at 16:40

Major rice markets close doors to genetically engineered rice after contamination of the global food supply chain - A Markets report.

1901 - 1910 of 3876 results.