Fisheries crisis: Government moves, but much remains to be done

Press release - February 3, 2009
BHUBANESHWAR, India — The Orissa government has shown some signs of responding to the turtle-fisheries crisis in the state by initiating institutional mechanisms to to address issues relating to conservation and management of marine resources in Orissa. Welcoming these steps, environmental group Greenpeace has also called for better action on the development of income generation schemes for the fishing community affected by restrictions imposed to protect turtles.

Along with the turtles traditional fishermen of Orissa are impacted by illegal mechanised fishing, especially trawling.

The mechanisms instituted by the government so far include:

         1. A commitment to include independent observers (local organisations) in the process of monitoring turtle mortalities along Orissa's coastline, to ensure transparency and greater accuracy.

         2. Creation of a dedicated budgetary head and resources, specifically for turtle conservation, which would assist in streamlining resources, while increasing the accountability of the Department of Forests - Wildlife.

         3. The deployment of marine patrolling with fast patrol boats by the Directorate of Fisheries

In November 2008, Greenpeace released an approach paper "Orissa - Turning Seas of Trouble into Seas of Plenty" (1). The paper discussed the steady decline in fish catch and the potential threat that this poses for the 4.5 lakh strong fisher population of Orissa. It espoused a solution as well - sustainable fisheries management -- which will safeguard the livelihoods of the traditional fishing population, while by default, reducing turtle mortalities significantly. In the paper, Greenpeace had recommended a separate budget head for turtle conservation and transparency mechanisms for recording mortalities.

"The season of 2008-2009 has brought with it a flavour of change", said Areeba Hamid, Oceans Campaigner, Greepeace. "Turtle mortalities have so far reduced by close to 20% in the Devi region, as compared to the same time last year (2).  While we are happy at the progress made, the forest department needs to commit to progressively reducing the annual turtle mortality over the next five seasons (3).   This would enable the Government's marine conservation efforts to be evaluated objectively. Simultaneously, regular marine patrolling by the Fisheries department is vital to safeguard the interests of traditional fishermen from trawling, which currently is operating unchecked in the region (4). This would result in a substantial drop in turtle mortalities as well".  

The position paper also reminds the Orissa government of its duty towards allocating sufficient resources to tackle the fishery crisis, both by providing patrolling and enforcement resources, as well as compensation and alternative means of livelihood for traditional fishermen affected by fishing restrictions. The existing legislative framework, including the Orissa Marine Fishing regulation Act of 1982 and directives of the Central Empowered Committee of the Supreme Court (2004) clearly spell out the specific responsibilities of the state government authorities. However, implementation of existing laws has been weak.  

Hamid added "These are steps in the right direction, and we are now hopefully seeing the beginning of the end of the turtle-fisheries conflict. Of course, for these commitments to translate into real change, continued implementation on the ground is absolutely necessary. It is now more vital than ever that the Government of Orissa also expedite an alternative livelihood or income generation programme, for traditional fishermen in the Gahirmatha, Devi and Rushikulya regions". In conclusion, she said "For such programmes to be successful, cognizance must be taken of socio-cultural realities, to ensure their approval and acceptability. We look forward to the Government announcing a time-lined road map on such a programme, which would serve the interests of over 100,000 fishermen in the state".  

For further information, contact

1. Saumya Tripathy, Greenpeace Communications, , +91-93438 62212
2. Areeba Hamid, Oceans Campaigner, Greenpeace India, , +91-99005 69456.

Notes to Editor

1. Please refer to http://www.greenpeace.org/india/press/releases/turning-seas-of-trouble-into-s">http://www.greenpeace.org/india/press/releases/turning-seas-of-trouble-into-s for further details.
2. Please refer to Annexure I for further details.
3. Such a commitment would mean that the turtle mortality for the upcoming season would be reduced by 35%, and the goal at the end of five years would see mortalities reduced from the current average of 12,500 to around 2400. Of course, a transparent system for monitoring mortalities is key to evaluating such targets. Please refer to http://www.greenpeace.org/india/press/releases/turning-seas-of-trouble-into-s">http://www.greenpeace.org/india/press/releases/turning-seas-of-trouble-into-s for further details.
4. Please refer to Annexure I for further details.

Categories