Skip navigation.
Representatives of Orissa’s turtles, seeking insurance from the 
destruction to be caused by Tata’s Dhamra Port, hang a banner outside 
the office of Tata AIG Life Insurance in Mumbai.

Representatives of Orissa’s turtles, seeking insurance from the destruction to be caused by Tata’s Dhamra Port, hang a banner outside the office of Tata AIG Life Insurance in Mumbai.

Enlarge Image

Mumbai, India — Challenging TATAs insurance slogan “Take a new look at life” four turtles appeared at the Mumbai Office of TATA AIG Life Insurance, asking for insurance cover to protect them from Tata’s proposed port at Dhamra in Orissa. The turtles unfurled a banner outside the TATA AIG office which read, ‘TATA, Take A Turtle-friendly Look at Life!’

“We are here seeking insurance cover on behalf of the 500,000 turtles that congregate along the coast of Orissa every year. We want the Tatas to insure us against the risk of the Dhamra Port destroying our feeding and mating grounds. The Tata port poses an immediate danger to the very survival of our species as it threatens our most important habitat on the entire planet”, said Turtle Spokesperson Sachin Gupta.

Tata Steel’s proposed port is less than 15 km. from the world’s largest mass nesting site at Gahirmatha, where up to 500,000 turtles have been known to nest in a single year. Tata’s has always maintained that turtles are not found near the port site, and if evidence of their presence was recorded, they would reconsider the port. In March 2007, a study conducted by renowned herpetologist and member of the IUCN’s Amphibian Specialist Group Dr. S.K. Dutta unequivocally established the presence of turtles in the offshore waters near the port. (1) The study also recorded other rare species on the port site itself, which have been ignored in the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) done for the project. (2)

Greenpeace has been in touch with the Tatas since the release of the report but the points raised by the study have yet to be addressed.  Tata Steel has continued to claim publicly that the port will not impact turtles, though they have not been able to provide any evidence for this statement. Further, the company has chosen to ignore specific scientific concerns raised by Greenpeace, through the Critique of the Dhamra EIA report as well as the findings of the biodiversity assessment which Greenpeace had commissioned.

“The TATAs have said that if there is scientific evidence that the port will harm the turtles, they will withdraw from the port project. The March 2007 study puts the issue beyond doubt. We now call upon Ratan Tata to walk the talk and act with the integrity that JRD Tata and the other legends of the family would be proud of. Tata’s must act now to save the turtles, by withdrawing from the port project”, said Ashish Fernandes, Oceans Campaigner with Greenpeace India.

Related news stories

Related Reports

Notes to Editor

(1) The biodiversity assessment conducted by Dr. S.K. Dutta recorded the presence of over 2,000 turtle carcasses on the port site, probably victims on mechanized fishing in the waters off the port site. Other significant findings include a large population of horseshoe crabs and rare frog and snake species that are the the first confirmed records from mainland India. The complete report is available at www.greenpeace.org/india/press/reports
(2) The Dhamra Port EIA has been scientifically critiqued by Greenpeace scientists from the School of Biosciences, Exeter University and has been found to be fundamentally flawed. This critique is available at www.greenpeace.org/india/press/reports

Vision, video, photos, report information

Ashish Fernandes, Oceans Campaigner +91 99801 99380, ashish.fernandes@in.greenpeace.org Saumya Tripathy, Greenpeace Communications +91 93438 62212 saumya.tripathi@in.greenpeace.org