Skip navigation.
A frightened villager brings the lid of a barrel that contained 
uranium oxide (yellowcake) taken from the Tuwaitha nuclear facility, 
that was left unsecured by occupying forces after the fall of Saddam 
Hussein. The family used this radioactive barrel to store water and 
are complaining of rashes and skin problems.

A frightened villager brings the lid of a barrel that contained uranium oxide (yellowcake) taken from the Tuwaitha nuclear facility, that was left unsecured by occupying forces after the fall of Saddam Hussein. The family used this radioactive barrel to store water and are complaining of rashes and skin problems.

Enlarge Image

Greenpeace is opposed to war, and we don't believe war is the answer to ridding the world of Weapons of Mass Destruction. That's one of the reasons why we took particular issue with the war on Iraq. We joined with people all over the world in months of global action to promote a non-violent solution to the conflict in Iraq.

We believed the war was more about oil than about effectively dealing with weapons of mass destruction. It would result in devastating human and environmental consequences, and set a dangerous (not to mention illegal)precedent.

Though the occupying forces were quick to secure Iraqi oil fields, they neglected to safeguard dangerous nuclear material. Now that material has made its way to homes and schools. Weapons of mass destruction, the alleged reason for the war in the first place, were never found.

Uranium and other nuclear material stored under UN control in Iraq until the fall of Saddam Hussein have been stolen and local residents are reportedly displaying symptoms of radiation poisoning. Six weeks after the occupying forces took control of the country, the US finally conceded that the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), could return to assess what has been stolen at part of one site, Tuwaitha. Yet the IAEA has been refused access to the nearby population or to other sites it wants to visit, in contravention of UN resolutions.

We went to Iraq in June 2003 with a small, specialist team to examine the local environment and to assess the extent of any nuclear contamination. The team took samples of soil and water for laboratory analysis and conducted on-site monitoring with specialist radiation detection equipment. While the extent of the Greenpeace radiological survey will not be comprehensive, it will provide some idea of the true level of risk to the people of the area and to the environment.

We are calling for a full assessment of the situation at Tuwaitha and other nuclear sites in Iraq:

  • The occupying powers must allow the IAEA to remain in Iraq with an unrestricted mandate to test as well as document all nuclear sites.
  • The occupying powers must allow the IAEA to oversee an urgent medical and environmental assessment of the impact of the radioactive material that has spread in the local community - a practice that would be standard in any other country and circumstance.
  • A hunt for all the industrial radioactive isotopes in Iraq must be conducted urgently - these are all potential dirty bombs.

Related reports

Peace Prize for IAEA a mistake

07 October 2005

Extended Greenpeace statement on the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Dr Mohamed ElBaradei and the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Download Document (47 Kb)

Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations

23 September 2005

An unclassified draft of a US nuclear doctrine review that spells out conditions under which US commanders might seek approval to use nuclear weapons.

Download Document (1 Mb)

Comment matrix on Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations

23 September 2005

Comments from the US military branches to the Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations, which outlines how and under what circumstances nuclear weapons might be deployed by the US military.

Download Document (1 Mb)

Nuclear Weapons Accidents Briefing Paper (1950-1993)

01 March 1996

The twenty-three accidents listed in this report involving U.S., Soviet, and Russian nuclear weapons or nuclear-armed ships and submarines are some of the more serious nuclear accidents to befall U.S. and Soviet nuclear forces. As a result of accidents, some 51 nuclear warheads were lost into sea (44 Soviet and 7 U.S. However, at least one Soviet warhead was recovered). Also, seven nuclear reactors (5 Soviet and 2 U.S.) from three Soviet and two U.S. nuclear- powered submarines have been lost at sea due to accidents. Another 19 nuclear reactors from nuclear-powered vessels have been deliberately dumped at sea (18 Soviet and 1 U.S.).

Download Document (63 Kb)

Neptune papers III ; Naval nuclear accidents at sea

01 June 1990

A 1990 listing of accidents involving naval vessels which were either nuclear powered or carrying nuclear weapons. Note: This is an automated, and imperfect, scan of a paper document.

Download Document (1 Mb)

Neptune papers III ; Naval nuclear accidents at sea

03 February 1990

A 1990 listing of accidents involving naval vessels which were either nuclear powered or carrying nuclear weapons. Note: This is an automated, and imperfect, scan of a paper document.

Download Document (1 Mb)

The Greenpeace Book of the Nuclear Age

01 June 1989

The Hidden History, the Human Cost
From the introduction: "This book will introduce you to the black briefcase in the red shack, take you on a helicopter ride over a burning nuclear core, into a damaged reactor in which life-forms are breeding, and through a realm of black humour and mystical coincidence. Because the effects of radiation take decades to reveal themselves, almost all the stories in this book are current, even though some of them begin in the mid-1940s. In this context, information develops its own half-life - the amount of time it takes for official truth to leak out of the canisters in which it is contained."
Note: This is an automated, and imperfect, scan of a paper document.

Download Document (3 Mb)
More reports