The saying, "If you not part of the solution, you're part of the problem", is a massive understatement when it comes to the Bush administration and climate change. With less than 5 percent of the world's population, the US is the world's largest producer of greenhouse gases and is responsible for nearly 25 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions.
And yet, the Bush administration has withdrawn from the only
internationally binding measure to tackle climate change - the Kyoto
Protocol. Instead, the policy of the Bush administration, and its
legislative allies, is business as usual but only more so. They are
giving millions of dollars in subsidies to the oil, gas and coal
industries; making no credible effort to support renewable energy; and
are opening the Arctic National Wildlife refuge for drilling. On the
international scene, the Bush administration has made extraordinary
efforts to impede progress in tackling climate change. Again and again,
at international meetings Greenpeace delegates have watched the Bush
team try to obstruct and weaken international efforts to reduce global
emissions, just as it has tried to wreck so many other international
negotiations over the past 15 years.
Not living up to its promise
Ironically,
the US could easily be a world leader in addressing climate
change. Along with energy efficiency, the US has made significant
contributions to wind and solar technology development, and despite
lack of support from the Bush administration both industries show
strong domestic growth. US scientists have also played an
important role in climate change research. For example, in what
is being called the "smoking gun" of global warming, a decade long NASA
led research project has confirmed that our planet is absorbing more
energy from the sun than is emitted back into space - indicating an
"energy imbalance" and a warming world.
Taking a leadership role in climate change would also benefit the US in many ways. For example:
- More skilled jobs - Renewable energy creates more jobs per kilowatt than fossil fuels or nuclear.
- Smaller US trade deficit - Solar and wind power hardware will likely find lucrative export markets.
- Greater energy security - Less reliance on foreign oil.
- Foster international good will - By joining the rest of the world in tackling climate change.
Ballon with a clear message floats above a glacier in Argentina threathened by global warming.
Instead,
the Bush administration continues to ignore its own scientists, and act
as if climate change isn't happening. Bush’s energy policies
would seem divorced from reality if it weren’t for the cold hard cash
Bush and his political allies get from the fossil fuel and nuclear
industries as campaign contributions. It seems these political
contributions, and Bush's own past with the oil industry, handily
outweigh scientific evidence and world opinion when it comes to his
administration's energy policy.
Greenpeace will continue
to pressure the US government to take action on climate change.
It is also working to persuade US states, cities, the business
community and individuals not to wait for the government, but to move
ahead on their own by implementing energy efficiency technologies and
buying renewable energy. See the
Greenpeace USA actions page for how you can help.
More information:
US withdraws from Kyoto ProtocolStage is set to drill in Arctic refugeBush energy scamsEnergy scams continued...Greenpeace USABig oil protects its interests - Center for Public IntegrityUS Government 'out on a limb over climate change science' - Royal Society news
Who's to blame ten years after Rio? (pdf)