Is there still a problem?

This is the way the nuclear industry acknowledges these people's suffering - by calling their homes and livelihoods a "sacrifice zone." Instead of supporting these communities with their significant medical, economic, ecological and social problems, Western companies continue to negotiate business deals to export more and more poisonous waste to be dumped and forgotten.

Nine-year-old Nastya Eremenko, a victim of the Chernobyl accident at Buda Kashelevo, Belarus, has been living with cancers in her uterus and lungs since she was three years old. If she asked you "why do I get your country's nuclear waste?" - would you be able to turn to her and answer, "Because you live in Belarus?" No. So why do we allow our energy generators to do just this?

The western European utilities and nuclear industry would never dare to think of dumping radioactive waste in the outskirts of Paris or the suburbs of Helsinki. The fact that such practices are tolerated in the 21century is appalling; the international community has simply failed to protect innocent people.

Since the days of the 1950's when nuclear-powered electricity was hailed as the answer to the world's energy problems, nuclear power has remained only a marginal energy source, supplying only 2 percent of the global primary energy demand. Even that tiny proportion wouldn't have been possible without  huge public subsidies.

Nuclear energy is the most expensive electricity source available, taking into account the cost of building, running and decommissioning the power stations. But an economic analysis alone cannot calculate the costs due to the damage done to the gene pool, the very web of life affected by radiation. There are many other costs to take into consideration such as insurance and the cost of potential accidents, the long-term disposal of waste, which is impossible to calculate when no reliable solution has yet been found. Nuclear power is actually not a solution for climate change. The massive subsidies needed to keep the nuclear industry alive, are slowing and undermine the renewable energy revolution that is the real solution to climate change.

Fifty years on from the birth of the nuclear power industry, the true price of nuclear is being paid by those with the least money - the poor and the sick who live with the debilitating effects of radiation.

Take a look at the images of those living with the worst aspects of the nuclear industry for a glimpse of that deadly legacy. The four regions portrayed are just a sample of what could happen in any part of the world at any time. The destructive and polluting power of nuclear is a global risk; nuclear waste respects no national boundaries. The insidious traces of what happened in Chernobyl can still be found today in Northern Ireland, Sweden and even Saudi Arabia - and they will persist for thousands of years to come.

The truth is that nuclear reactors are most effective at burning money, but to every victim of the nuclear industry, it is more than money that was burned. Renewable energies don't kill thousands of people when they go wrong, poison people every day they operate or leave dangerous contamination for thousands of years. The world doesn't need more nuclear power plants - it needs a clean energy revolution.