One of the many thousands of homes deserted after the Chernobyl disaster.
Enlarge Image
In the Ukraine, 18,000km2 of agricultural land was contaminated, but the forests were hardest hit. Forty percent of the woods are contaminated, totalling 35,000km2. Many of the inhabitants of the area cotinue to eat fruits and vegetables from their own gardens and they also continue fishing and gathering mushrooms and berries. This is what they are used to doing, even if it means that their intake of radioactive elements is two to five times higher than is acceptable.
According to the Ukraine government, this is the case for 3.5 million
people. In Russia, 19 regions were affected, with 2.7 million people
living in the area, and in Belarus a quarter of the nation's territory
was hit by two-thirds of the radioactive fallout from Chernobyl. At the
time, 2.2 million people were living there, a number that has since
dwindled to 1.5 million. The area around the second biggest
city of Gomel was particularly affected.
Grigory and Maria Smeyan, aged 71 and 77 respectively, found themselves
uprooted after the accident. They were living 27km away from Chernobyl
on the Belarusian side. Their village was evacuated in June 1986, says
Mr. Smeyan: "There was a truck for every two or three families. We were
allowed to take one bed, a bag of potatoes and food for three days.
They gave us tinned meat, oranges and 1500 roubles per person." Mrs.
Smeyan: "We used that to buy new furniture, but we had to leave behind
our animals: two cows, a calf and two pigs of 280 kilograms each." The
zone was closed off and they were not allowed back in: "My aunt died
and we wanted to bury her in native soil." At the checkpoint they were
stopped and sent away. "We had to bury her in another village." Maria
Smeyan is not bothered about going back anymore, but Grigory is. "If I
could I would go there today even. Over there the nightingales were
singing and here there are only crows."
An often-cited story claims that in order to prevent radioactive
contamination reaching Moscow, the clouds were manipulated to rain over
the south-east of Belarus. In any case, Vetka is still contaminated.
"The question was: would the town survive?", says Vasily Bahajev, an
economist and deputy leader of the local council. "In the end there was
no evacuation. Where could all those people have gone to? Before
Chernobyl, 37,000 lived here, now the number is still some 20,000."
Instead of evacuating, they have tried to improve social services and
health care. "Gas and waterworks were installed throughout the area.
Children are given extra food and pregnant women get vitamin supplies."
The newly-built clinic and the school are run by newly-trained staff
straight out of college. It is mandatory for them to work in the
south-east for some years in exchange for their student loans.
In Vetka, president Lukashenko unveiled a new Chernobyl monument: "So
people don't have to go to their contaminated villages anymore when
they wish to commemorate the disaster", says Bahajev. Parts of the
villages, agricultural lands and forests remain closed territory, but
there is hardly any supervision. Close to the residential areas, the
contaminated areas start within municipal boundaries and continue for
many miles. They are mostly deserted, but cows are grazing on overgrown
meadows." Bahajev: "The farmer has refused to leave, but it is said
that if the cows are transferred to clean grazing grounds for two weeks
before slaughter, the meat will be clean and edible."
-------------
The above text is an extract from the forth-coming book;
Certificate no. 000358/Nuclear devastation in Kazakhstan, Ukraine,
Belarus, the Urals and Siberia. © (Photography) 2006 Robert Knoth, ©
(Text) 2006 Antoinette de Jong.