As the planet wakes up to the fact that global warming is a reality and that fast action is needed, the nuclear industry, having floundered for a few decades, has seized on the opportunity to promote itself as the answer to our energy fears.
It seems that global governments are suffering from mass amnesia and
are doing a good job of spreading it around.
The reality of nuclear
power is no different now than it was in the 20th Century - it is
inherently dangerous. Time and time again the industry has demonstrated
that safety and nuclear power is a contradiction in terms.
Safe reactors are a myth. An accident can occur in any nuclear reactor,
causing the release of large quantities of deadly radiation into the
environment. Even during normal operations radioactive materials are
regularly discharged into the air and water. The policy of secrecy,
which surrounded the development of the bomb, was transferred to civil
nuclear power projects after World War II and lives on today.
The nuclear industy was suffering serious nuclear accidents long before
the catastrophic
Chernobyl accident in 1986. Twenty years later the
industry is plagued with incidents, accidents and near-misses.
Aging of nuclear reactors, in particular the effect of prolonged
operation on materials and large components, is endemic throughout the
world's nuclear industry. At the same time nuclear operators are
continually trying to reduce costs due to both greater competition in
the electricty market and the need to meet shareholder expectations.
Just a few examples of industrial nuclear incidents that highlight the
world is never far away from the next nuclear catastrophe:
- Japan, as one of the largest operators of nuclear power had its
worst nuclear accident in 1999 at the Tokai-mura nuclear fuel plant
when two workers received lethal doses of radiation; one year later, it
was revealed that vital safety data and inspections had been
manipulated at tens of reactors to avoid 'expensive' repairs and
lengthy closure;
- Despite claims that the nuclear industry and government had
adopted higher safety standards, in 2004, a steam explosion at the
Mihama reactor killed five workers. In 2006 a district court ordered
the shut down of a nuclear reactor as it could not withstand severe
earthquakes - all of Japan's reactors are sitting on top of one of the
world's most active geological faults;
- The US, with the world's largest fleet of nuclear power plants,
only just avoided a catastrophic accident at the David-Besse reactor in
2002, when it was discovered that corrosion had come very close to
penetrating the vital pressure vessel - an accident scenario that can
lead to a complete reactor core meltdown. Greenpeace ten years before
had filed a complaint to the US nuclear regulator warning of the risk
of corrosion at all US nuclear power plants. The warning was ignored;
following the discovery at David-Besse, it was shut down for two years
(costing US$600 million), but then given a license to operate until
2017;
- French nuclear safety agency activated its emergency response
center in December 2003 in response to torrential rainfall along the
lower Rhone River, following the emergency shut down of two reactors
(Cruas-3 and -4) due to flood affected damage;
- In 2000, the UK Sellafield nuclear fuel processing site was found
to have a fundamental failure of safety culture by Government
inspectors - but only after public disclosure of violations of quality
control and safety standards at its newest nuclear plant (Sellafield
MOX Plant). This helped convince the government of Ireland to launch a
legal challenge against the UK government at the UN International Court
in Hamburg on the issue of nuclear safety at Sellafield.
In addition to the risk of accident, nuclear plants are highly
vulnerable to deliberate acts of sabotage and terrorist attack. Even
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which promotes the use
of nuclear power, admitted that in the light of the September 11th 2001
attacks in New York that:
"Most nuclear power plants were built
during the 1960s and 1970s, and like the World Trade Center, they were
designed to withstand only accidental impacts from the small 'Cessna'
type sports aircraft. If you postulate the risk of a jumbo jet full of
fuel, it is clear that their design was not conceived to withstand such
an impact."
Find out more:
Remember that renewables are the future!
Check out
our nuclear calander - a nuclear incident for every day of the year
Our report on
Nuclear Reactor Hazards, Ongoing Dangers of Operating Nuclear plants.
Download our
Nuclear Glossary.