Make no mistake; nuclear weapons are still a problem today. Although some may consider them an unfortunate relic from the Cold War, the truth is that the nuclear weapons states are clinging to them as hard as they can, reinventing new roles and designs for them, and recently even proposals for "smaller useable" weapons. And all this despite plenty of speeches, promises and legally binding treaties to get rid of them!
There is no such thing as a small nuclear explosion, any nuclear
explosion will have catastrophic consequences for all living things on
the planet. The existence and spread of nuclear weapons stands in the
way of any real possibilities for true safety, security and peace. The
only solution is to abolish them.
In recent years the threat has
become even more unpredictable as the nuclear weapon states - the US,
the UK, France, Russia and China - have failed to follow their promises
made in the
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
to disarm. Countries like Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea have
also joined the nuclear weapons club. And due to the widespread use of
nuclear energy about 40 other countries have access to nuclear
weapons material and therefore possess the ability to develop nuclear
weapons.
The International community as a whole and several
key states in particular, must grapple with need to resolve the
contradiction at the heart of the nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty
which some claim means nuclear energy is an "inalienable right". The
"inalienable right" to nuclear energy is a historical and political
mistake; the real legitimate right is to clean and safe energy and
nuclear energy is neither. The world has witnessed the acquisition of
nuclear weapons capabilities through so-called peaceful civilian
nuclear programmes in India, North Korea and Iraq.
But there is
hope, some countries have lead the way by getting rid of their weapons.
South Africa had nuclear weapons in the 1970s but chose the benefits of
disarmament, joining the international community as a country that
valued cooperation rather than violence. Once the decision is made,
disarmament can happen quite quickly.
Unless leaders of
nuclear weapons states follow South Africa's example and begin to
dismantle their arsenals, the political leaders in the aspiring nuclear
weapons states are unlikely to either. Obviously the more leaders with
fingers on the button, the more likely one of them will trigger a
nuclear war, by accident or design.
In every case, politicians
and military leaders have pursued nuclear weapons without democratic
debate in their country. Public opinion polls conducted in nuclear and
non-nuclear weapon states show large majorities favouring the abolition
of nuclear weapons, and every year at the United Nations when all
governments vote, we see the vast majority of the 191 countries voting
for the abolition of nuclear weapons. Citizens in nuclear weapons
states should question why their leaders feel so entitled to gamble
with their lives.
Find out more: