The chemicals industry claims the substances it produces are adequately controlled and do not pollute the environment. However, detailed scientific studies have found man-made toxic chemicals present in the bodies of polar bears, in Alpine lakes and in indigenous populations thousands of kilometres from the source of these chemicals. Our own scientific investigations have detected toxic chemicals in our homes, in our blood, in rainwater. Unborn infants are exposed to many manmade pollutants while still in the womb.
House Dust
Greenpeace teams armed with vacuum cleaners sampled house dust from
homes and offices across Europe, and had it analysed for hazardous
chemicals.
The results, from 13 countries (Netherlands, France, UK,
Spain, Italy, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Belgium, Slovakia, Austria,
Poland and Czech Republic), showed substantial quantities of the kinds
of hazardous chemicals contained in everyday household products like
textiles, televisions, cosmetics and toys. The findings suggest that we
are exposed in our homes and offices to a daily cocktail of chemicals
suspected of causing harm to human health.
Rainwater
To most people, rain is the pure refreshing act of nature that washes
away the dirt and refreshes the landscape. But along with the rain come
some nasty chemicals.
Recent research on rainwater in the Netherlands,
Belgium and Germany revealed that rainwater is polluted with a range of
toxic chemicals. This pollution is particularly worrying because the
chemicals identified include known and suspected hormone disrupters.
This means they act like the hormones that we and other animals
naturally have in our bodies. They can disrupt the correct functioning
of the body and harm reproduction and development. While most of our
exposure to these chemicals is likely to come from other sources (food,
contaminated indoor air and dust or from products themselves), their
presence in rainwater is an illustration of their widespread
distribution through the environment and represents a further source of
contamination.
Umbilical Cord Blood
The umbilical cord is more than a prenatal lifeline: it's also the
unborn child's link to the toxic burden of our planet. Analysis of
maternal and umbilical cord blood provided by volunteers in the
Netherlands, published in a report entitled '
A Present for Life', reveals
that known or suspected hazardous substances, present in everyday
household products, are entering babies' bodies through the umbilical
cord. The chemicals include some that are known to affect physical and
mental development in animals.
The report, commissioned jointly by Greenpeace International,
Greenpeace Netherlands and WWF-UK, investigated the presence of
hazardous chemicals in maternal and cord blood samples. The results
clearly show the presence of these chemicals in the blood serum samples
from both mother and child.
Professor Pieter Sauer, Professor of Pediatrics from University
Hospital Groningen, is concerned about the findings: "Our children are
being exposed to polluting chemicals, though we have hardly any
information on the long-term effects."
Particularly worrying are the hormone-disrupting chemicals, which may
cause most damage during the vulnerable stages of development that is
during periods of rapid cell division, such as in early life and
particularly when in the womb. A small disturbance in early development
can have serious and irreversible consequences for later life.
Consumer Products
We have investigated the levels of hazardous substances in electronic
equipment, textiles, toys, cosmetics, cleaning products, sport shoes,
mattresses, food packaging and flooring. In a project focusing on
children's textiles we found six types of
hazardous substances in 21
samples of Disney clothes purchased around the world, some at very high
levels. Our
tests on perfumes didn't smell that sweet either; none of
the 36 perfumes tested was free of the two groups of hazardous
substances we looked for.
Engaging progressive companies
In order to demonstrate clearly that substitution is possible and
already happening we organised the "
Substitute with Style" catwalk.
Such an event showed the steps taken by major consumer brands to stop
using hazardous chemicals in a wide range of products, including
clothing, cosmetics and electronic goods. The show highlighted how
progressive and innovative companies can remove hazardous chemicals,
such as brominated flame retardants and PVC among the others, from
their products and substitute them with available safer alternatives.
Unfortunately many industrial sectors are making no such efforts to
stop using toxic chemicals. The purpose of the catwalk was, therefore,
to send out a clear signal to EU decision-makers, for them to
understand that it is only by setting a strong legal requirement to
substitute hazardous chemicals that human health and the environment
can be protected effectively, through triggering eco-innovation and
further research into safer substances.
Freshwater and Threatened Species
It is not just us - humans - paying the price of chemical pollution.
Our investigations have revealed that the European eel is
contaminated
with toxic chemicals, including brominated flame retardants (BFRs).
Adding insult to injury, the eel is already vanishing from lakes and
rivers across Europe, and some of these toxic chemicals look as if they
might last longer than the species itself.
Is this contamination a problem for eels? No one knows for sure but the
evidence is mounting that BFRs and other toxics have the potential to
damage development and hormone systems in humans and wildlife.
Certainly for an eel already under pressure, it's an extra dose of bad
news. Some scientists are concerned that these toxins could harm the
eel's ability reproduce or its young to survive. With populations in
some European waters are estimated to be as low as 1 percent of
historic levels, the eel clearly doesn't need a toxic insult to add to
its injuries.
Help us to ensure that REACH protects
us from hazardous chemicals. Act
now!