If someone came into your house, mixed you a cocktail of unknown chemicals - and offered you to drink it - would you take it? Of course not. You wouldn't want untested chemicals in your home, your drink, or your body. You don't want them - but shockingly - they're already there.
Chemicals have been developed over the past few decades to improve
everyday products. They are in toys, floor coverings, computers, shower
gels and detergents, textiles and mattresses. We are lying on, walking
on, touching and wearing chemicals every day.
What's wrong with that, you might ask, assuming the chemicals are safe?
You'd expect them to have been tested, monitored by someone from the
government and approved for use after knowing that they pose no
problem. Nothing could be further from the truth. Hazardous and
untested chemicals are routinely used as additives in consumer goods.
They add certain qualities - flexibility to plastics, scent to beauty
and cleaning products, fire resistance to soft furnishings. They may
have been added to stop plastics from breaking down, or to kill dust
mites or mould.
Unfortunately, some of these chemicals are known to be hazardous - yet
the current regulatory system allows their continued use in products we
bring into our homes. The so-called "risk assessments" try to determine
"safe limits" of exposure, but these do not guarantee protection from
the harmful effects of chemicals. That's because:
-
One cannot investigate all possible routes of
exposure to a chemical (e.g. from all types of food products or
environment) and have data available for all of them.
-
Assessments rarely consider exposure to more than
one chemical at a time or differences in the vulnerabilities of
different subgroups within populations (e.g. adults versus children);
and
-
Assessments start from the premise that some degree
of exposure, even to the most hazardous chemicals, can be judged
"acceptable". However, for many of the chemicals already known for some
time to present serious hazards, we just don't know the full and
long-term effects of these chemicals on our health or on our
environment, even at low doses.
Although we may not be aware of it, this means that persistent,
bioaccumulative, and toxic chemicals - as well as those which are known
to disrupt or mimic hormones, to be toxic to reproduction, to harm
immune systems, and some which may be carcinogenic - are already in our
kitchens, lounges, bedrooms and bathrooms. They are found in everyday
products and escape during normal use and through wear and tear over
time. For example:
-
Cosmetics, shampoos and personal care products can
contain synthetic musks. These substances can accumulate in our bodies
and could disrupt hormone systems.
- Your computer can contain fire-retardant brominated
chemicals, which exhibit developmental toxicity and may mimic hormones
produced by the thyroid gland.
- PVC products such as flooring can contain organotin
chemicals. They're used to stabilise the plastic but are toxic to the
immune system.
- Soft PVC, used in many products - such as shower
curtains or soft plastic case for your mobile - contains phthalates,
which can be toxic to reproduction.
- Waterproof jackets and other rain-gear could
contain perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs), chemicals, which are also used
and released during the manufacture of non-stick coatings for pans and
other cookware. These are now of increasing concern because of their
links to hormone disruption and promotion of cancer.
With evidence growing that these types of chemicals could be storing up
long-term problems for human health and the environment, it makes sense
to reduce or, ideally, eliminate our exposure to them. How can we
achieve it? Simple. By substituting hazardous chemicals wherever there
are available alternatives. Wishful thinking? Far from it - in most
cases, safer alternatives have existed on the market for years. What is
missing is the drive from governments to ensure that all manufacturers
switch to these alternatives. This so called 'substitution principle'
is the main demand of Greenpeace from REACH - the new European
chemicals policy.
Discover which brand named products can contain hazardous chemicals on our
Chemical Home site.
Before we can substitute the most hazardous chemicals, though, we need
to find out which ones they are. Some, like those listed above, are
well known. But how many of the other tens of thousands present similar
concerns? The fact is, no one knows. That's the other problem right
now. There exists only very limited safety information about most of
the 30,000 chemicals marketed in volumes over one tonne per year in the
EU. This could be compared to selling pharmaceuticals without having
first tested them for safety. No drug company may do this, yet the
chemicals companies have been doing so for years. In order to be
properly protected from hazardous chemicals, we need information about
their safety.
Help us to persuade European politicians to vote for
safer chemicals.