This page has been archived, and may no longer be up to date

Greenpeace attempts to stop whaling off the coast of Antarctica.

Antarctic whaling

In 1994, a sanctuary for whales was set in the Antarctic Ocean area. But since 1987, the Japanese government has conducted an annual whale hunt in the Antarctic under the guise of "scientific" whaling.

In fact the announcement of the was met by an increase in the "scientific" catch in the Antarctic by 100 whales that year.

At the June 2005 IWC meeting, the Japanese government announced plans to add endangered Antarctic fin and humpback whales to the growing list of great whale species hunted each year and to double its catch of minke whales.

In December of 2007, in the face of public outcry and diplomatic pressure from the US and Australia in particular, the government announced a temporary back-down on plans to kill 50 humpbacks in the 2007-2008 season.

Weird science

So what is wrong with a "scientific" whale hunt?

Professor Toshio Kasuya, of Teikyo University of Science and Technologyin Japan, gave his analysis in the Mainichi Shinbun newspaper inOctober 2005.

"The annual expenses of the research program amount toaround 6 billion yen, or more than US$50 million, of which 5billion yen is covered by the sales of whale meat produced from thecatch by the scientific whaling. Government subsidy and other fundingmake up the remaining 1 billion yen.

Without the earnings from the meatsales, the whaling organization that undertakes thegovernment-commissioned research program would be unable to continueoperation, and the shipping company that provides the fleet for theprogram would not be able to recover costs for whaling vesselconstruction.

This is nothing other than an economic activity. It leaves no room forresearchers to carry out research based on their own ideas. Itcertainly does not conform to the scientific purpose authorized by theConvention."

An increasing problem for the industry is the declining appetite forwhale meat in Japan, resulting in a public relations offensive toconvince the public that whaling is culturally and economicallyimportant to Japan.

It is also claimed that whales eat too manyfish and threaten the conservation of fish stocks - an assertion forwhich there is no scientific basis.

Professor Kasuya says, "The Institute of Cetacean Research argues thatlethal research is the only appropriate method to collect the neededdata. But examination of biopsy samples reveals the amount of blubberor reproductive rate, and analysis of faeces provides information onwhat whales are eating."

Going to the polls

The fact is, whale meat is a luxury food in Japan - and has been forseveral decades. An opinion poll conducted in 1999 showed that only 11percent of Japanese adults support whaling, with a similar number of 14percent of Japanese adults opposing it.

More recently, according to the Japanese Hamburger Association,Japanese people eat 40 times more hamburger than they do whalemeat.

This is not just because of the influx of Ronald McDonald -the Washington Post reported in 2005 that "last year, the [whaling]industry put 20 percent of its 4000-ton haul into frozen surplus."

Research by the Japanese Bureau of Statistics suggests that theconsumption of beef, pork and chicken was rising, and that of whalemeat dropping, from as early as the mid-1960s.

Whaling in Norway and Iceland

Japan is not the only place where whaling  - "scientific" orotherwise - is conducted. Norway resumed commercial whaling in1993 and Iceland announced, after a 14 year hiatus, that it wouldresume "scientific" whaling in August 2003. (Iceland had previouslyended its illegal commercial hunt in 1989 following worldwide boycottsand economic pressure.) Both countries want to export whale meat toJapan.

A resumption of international trade in whale products would havefar-reaching implications. Pirate whalers will have an even greaterincentive to hunt whales covertly, as it will become easier for them tosmuggle illegal whale meat into Japan.

Even with the current trade banin place, illegal whale meat from both abundant and endangered speciesof whales is regularly discovered on sale in Japan.

Solutions - Whale Sanctuaries and Whale Watching

Whale sanctuaries are places of refuge, off-limits to whaling, wherewhale populations can breed, feed and continue their slow recovery fromyears of exploitation. Sanctuaries offer critical opportunities topromote whale conservation and real, non-lethal scientific research.

Sanctuaries can also offer attractive economic benefits. They aid thedevelopment of whale watching, the only economic form of activityinvolving whales which is actually sustainable.

And we're not the onlyones who like the idea - whale watching is a thriving industry, withmore than 87 countries running whale watching operations , andgenerates US$1 billion in revenue worldwide each year.

But whaling is impacting the whale-watch industry in a negative way.When Iceland resumed whaling, whale watching bookings dropped by 90percent.

The Iceland Whale Watching Association blamed this onIceland's whaling industry and called for an end to whaling. The plansfor large-scale whaling were shelved and the whale watching industry isrecovering.

Many coastal nations have benefited from the development of whalewatching operations. For instance, the Dominican Republic alone netsUS$5.2 million from its eco-tourism, an industry that was given a boostby the creation of the Silver Bank Humpback Whale Marine Sanctuary.

InAustralia, the last whale was caught in Albany in 1978. Since then,Albany has transformed the former Cheynes Beach Whaling Station into ahigh profile whale watching site, attracting more than 1.3 millionvisitors.

More resources

Photos, videos, factsheets and news stories on Antarctic whaling

The latest updates

 

Whaling on trial

Feature story | March 8, 2010 at 0:00

The Tokyo Two trial continued today as a former whaler took to the stand and cast serious doubt on the veracity of the official investigation into our allegations of institutional embezzlement within Japan's whaling industry. He further revealed...

March 5: Exit Glacier in Alaska melting quicker as temperatures rise

Blog entry by Teresa Belkow | March 5, 2010 1 comment

This is part of a trial series Glacier melt - proof of climate change Exit Glacier in Alaska is said to be steadily melting, shrinking two miles over the past 200 years as it tries to strike a new balance with rising...

March 3: European Commission allows GE potato

Blog entry by Teresa Belkow | March 3, 2010 1 comment

This is part of a trial series Greenpeace stage an action with banners against the GE industry, in the hall of the EU commission building in Brussels. The action speaks out against methods used by GE companies to lobby the EU law...

March 2: Netherlands - people should know what they are voting for

Blog entry by Teresa Belkow | March 2, 2010 1 comment

This is part of a trial series Greenpeace raises awareness of new nuclear plant plans In Middelburg, Zeeland, the Netherlands , Greenpeace activists display an anti -nuclear banner at the city hall. The banner recreates...

February 22: Kumi steps up against Japanese whaling

Blog entry by Almudena | February 22, 2010

This is a trial series. Kumi Naidoo on the Tokyo Two Trial Greenpeace’s head Kumi Naidoo travelled to Japan to put some sense into Japan’s pro-whaling government heads, who refuse to back down. "I think that this is not only...

February 19: Australia plans legal action on Japan's whaling; UNFCC chief De Boer...

Blog entry by mwilson | February 19, 2010

This is a trial series. Members of Greenpeace in Finland show support for the "Tokyo Two" . Photo: © Matti Snellman / Greenpeace As the trial continues for the "Tokyo Two" (Greenpeace activists who exposed corruption behind the...

Opening Day of Tokyo Two Trial

Image | February 15, 2010 at 16:59

Greenpeace activists Toru Suzuki and Junichi Sato, with their lead defence counsel lawyer stand beside an ice sculpture of Lady Justice on the opening day of their trial in Aomori, Japan, Monday 15th February 2010.

Opening Day of Tokyo Two Trial

Image | February 15, 2010 at 16:42

Lead defense counsel for Greenpeace Japan Yuichi Kaido (left) watches as defendant Toru Suzuki holds up a dossier /fact file on his court case in a Greenpeace press conference at the end of the first day of trial.

February 15: "Tokyo Two" have pleaded not guilty; Tar Sands Olympics

Blog entry by Teresa Belkow | February 15, 2010

This is part of a trial series "Tokyo Two" Greenpeace activists, the "Tokyo Two" have been on trial in Tokyo today, where they have pleaded not guilty. If convicted they could face up to 10 years in prison. We believe the...

Trial for the Tokyo Two begins

Blog entry by Jess | February 15, 2010 2 comments

An update from Sarah Burton, Deputy Program Director currently in Aomori, Japan on the first day of the trial. It was Valentine’s night, and sure there was candle-light but it wasn’t a cozy tete-a-tete. Far from it. There was a...

71 - 80 of 471 results.

Categories