At international meeting: Whales 5, Whalers 1

Feature story - June 18, 2006
In a stunning turn about from expectations, pro-whaling nations have narrowly lost all four key votes so far at this year's International Whaling Commission (IWC) meeting. But they have won an ominous "St Kitts Declaration" vote. Here's the play by play...

The Yushin Maru catcher ship of the Japanese whaling fleet injures a whale with its first harpoon attempt, and takes a further three harpoon shots before finally killing the badly injured fleeing whale. Finally they drowned the mammal beneath the harpooon deck of the ship to kill it.

Vote 1:  On the opening day of the meeting,Japan moved to have any reference for a discussion on conservation ofsmall cetaceans (dolphins and porpoises) to be struck from theagenda.   This vote had been expected by many to demonstratethat pro-whaling nations had a majority.  Instead they weredefeated 32 votes to 30.

UPDATE2:  Much of our team in St Kitts hasbeen arrested during a peacefulprotest.

UPDATE 1: But we lost this one...

By a vote of 33 to 32 with one abstention, the IWC adopted on Sunday something called "The St. Kitts Declaration"which lays out the whaler's case for a return to whaling, and declaresa commitment to "normalize" the functions of the IWC.  Aside from,de facto, declaring a commitment to end the moratorium on commercialwhaling, its most significant implication is that it will be used tosay that the IWC has accepted that the consumption of fish by whalesmeans that the resumption of whaling is a matter of food security forcoastal nations.  We say the idea of whales being responsible forfisheries depletion is the equivalent of blaming woodpeckers fordeforestation.

Vote 2: Japan's call for secret ballots was defeated by 33 votes to30.  Transparency and openness at the IWC was narrowly preserved. 

Vote 3:  The third vote was on Japan's request for an exemption tothe moratorium on commercial whaling - so they could hunt 150 minkewhales and 150 Brydes whales in their own territorial waters.  

This year they came closer than ever before to achieving a majority onsuch a vote, which they have pushed every year for the last twodecades.  This year they lost 31 against, 30 in favour - with fourabstentions.

Vote 4:  A resolution vote to end the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary.  Japan lost this one 33 to 28.

Vote 5:A Resolution on the safety of vessels engaged in whaling and whaleresearch-related activities. Vote adopted by consensus with a reservation by St Kitts and Nevis.

In what amounted to a international diplomatic version of a group hug,pro and anti whaling nations found common ground near the end of thisIWC meeting, by adopting a resolution endorsing the right to protest onthe high seas while asking everyone to, "keep it safe out there".Full text is here.

The second paragraph says "Whereas the Commission and ContractingGovernments support the right to legitimate and peaceful forms ofprotest and demonstration" … so the IWC, which includes Japan, supportsthe right to peaceful protest. Not a bad result for an agenda itemoriginallydesigned to throw us out! Needless to say, we are happy to be able tocontinue our work inside the IWC - to support our work outside of it.

But despite these knife edged victories, all is not well for thewhales.  The conference still has two more days to go.  Andthis winter, the Japanese whaling fleet will return to the SouthernOcean Whale Sanctuary, where under a self allotted quota they will takeup to 935 minke whales and ten endangered fin whales.  

In response, we have pledged our own return to the Sanctuary - to onceagain put ourselves between whale and harpoon, and continue to use allpeaceful means to protect the whales.  

Read reports from our team on the ground at the IWC.

Tags