Climatewash - It's the all new greenwash

Feature story - July 27, 2007
So it's official. Climate change is in. Global warming is hip. Pop stars are urging action. It seems not a day passes without another big business making a green pronouncement. The scale of the problem is clear but there are still very few big companies walking their climate talk.

Climatewash - Greenwash 2.0. Simple, cheap and no real change needed - great for big business!

Live Earth was great for raising awareness on climate change andpromoting ways everyone can help. To see global megastars urging actionon climate change to an audience of billions warms the heart of many ahardened Greenpeace climate campaigner. Today is certainly light years awayfrom when we first started campaigning nearly 20 years ago on what was then a little known issue.

Awareness raised, but where's the corporate action?

This year has seen the science debate (artificially prolonged by dirtyenergy funded front groups) settled. And Live Earth helped raiseawareness of the problem in many countries to an unprecedented level.But even a quick scan of the Live Earth sponsors reveals many companieswho, while spending millions on appearing to be concerned about climatechange, are profiting from climate changing business as usual.

Just down the road from our international office in Amsterdam is a majorDutch energy company called Nuon, which sponsored the Dutch Live Earth event. Butwhat Nuon isn't so keen to highlight is that it's one of the companiespushing ahead with the building of five new coal power plants in theNetherlands.

  If built these willguarantee the Dutch government's 30 percent CO2 reduction by 2020 target willnot be met.  Dirty, polluting business as usual.

As coal power stations are one of the biggest single causes of climatechange no new ones should be being built. That's the sort of seriousaction required. Yet most big power companies are trying to forge ahead withplans for massive new coal plants in Europe, Asia and the Americas. Thevery same companies you pay your energy bill to are telling you theycare, but spending that money like they never knew coal was a bad idea.

Many big oil companies (now marketing themselves as 'energy' companies)like BP, Shell and even Exxon are throwing the odd million or severalat websites and ad campaigns to say they are looking for solutions toclimate change. But in fact they are spending billions finding andextracting more oil. Exxon even still funds the climate skeptic frontgroups that exist to attempt to muddy the water and stall action onclimate change.

Green cars?

General Motors (owner of Chevy) and DaimlerChrysler (owner of the Smartcar brand) were two massive car makers hoping for some positiveassociation with Live Earth. However, what you won't see onDaimlerChrysler's website is the fact that their (and other big Germancar makers) lobbying was crucial in preventing the European Union fromimposing tough new efficiency regulations on cars in 2006. Carmanufactures had eight years to comply with previous voluntary targets(that they mostly failed miserably to meet), hence the EU proposal fornew strict legally binding rules. Yet, European car manufactures(supported by US car firms, like General Motors) lobbied successfullythat there should be significantly weaker efficiency regulations, ascar companies should be free to sell lots of big, inefficient andpolluting cars. (Report on car industry EU lobbying).

That's the real sign of how companies like DaimlerChrysler have failed to change in response to the climate challenge.

The lights are on, but there's no climate champion home

One big area where a simple and significant win for the climate can bemade is lighting. Old style incandescent bulbs are so inefficient thatby just switching from old to new efficient lighting technology in theEU we could close down 25 medium sized power plants, and possibly saveEurope 3-5 billion euros.

Right now major lighting manufactures like Phillips, GE and Osram havemumbled about a possible incandescent phase out in maybe 10 years time.But being the makers of most of the inefficient lightbulbs on theglobal market it's time they were more ambitious. Why not a bold climatemove now - stop making incandescent bulbs to focus solely on sellingmore efficient lighting. As the companies obviously need some pressureto take this step you can write to them now.

"Business as usual is no longer an option"

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

That was the UN head talking about the need for a new politicalagreement on climate change, but he could just have easily beenaddressing business leaders.

If we are to have any chance to meeting the necessary carbon emissionreductions required to prevent a climate crisis there must to be majorchanges now. No new coal plants should be approved. Old inefficientlighting must be made a thing of the past. Gas guzzling cars belong onthe scrap heap.

While we can all do our bit individually to combat climate change it'scompanies taking real action that can massively magnify our individualactions and be themselves ahead of the competition when governmentregulation on climate is enforced.

To date the signs have not been promising. Examples of real action arefew. Some power companies have dropped plans for a handful of coalplants in places like the US and New Zealand. A handful of retailers,like Currys in the UK, have stopped selling wasteful incandescentbulbs.

But given the scale of the climate crisis facing us all it's high timebig companies stopped just talking green and took action to make theirbusiness climate friendly. Anything less just results in more hot air.

Take action

Take personal action and pressure companies to make real changes to tackle climate change by taking our 7 Steps.

Donate

We never allow ourselves to be fed by a hand we might want to bite. Not accepting corporate donations means we rely entirely on people like you to help keep us going. Some of our corporate targets spend in a few hours what we spend in an entire year. Please help with anything you can.

Categories