Absolute oil corrupts absolutely.
In the email, Myron Ebell of the Exxon-funded Competitive
Enterprise Institute writes to Phil Cooney, a senior official at
the White House Council for Environmental Quality. He describes his
plans to discredit an EPA study on climate change through a
lawsuit. He states the need to "drive a wedge between the President
and those in the Administration who think that they are serving the
president's interests by publishing this rubbish." He notes his
group is considering a call for the then-head of the Environmental
Protection Agency, Christine Todd Whitman, to resign, and openly
suggests that she'd make an appropriate "fall gal" if the
administration is serious about getting back into bed with
conservatives opposing action on climate change.
His memo to the US government official begins "Thanks for
calling and asking for our help." (You can view the entire memo here.)
That statement, and the cosy, conspiratorial tone of the
document was enough to make Richard Blumenthal, State Attorney
General of Connecticut, and G. Steven Rowe, State Attorney General
of Maine, demand an investigation by US Attorney General John
Ashcroft into whether Cooney or other officials in the Bush
administration solicited the Competitive Enterprise Institute's
filing of the new lawsuit, as the memo certainly makes it
appear.
The Competitive Enterprise Institute received nearly a half
million dollars in funding last year from Exxon/Mobil, the world's
largest oil company.
According to the two State Attorney Generals, the email obtained
by Greenpeace
"reveals great intimacy between CEI and [Bush Administration
official Cooney] in their strategizing about ways to minimize the
problem of global warming. It also suggests that CEQ [the Council
of Environmental Quality] may have been directly involved in
efforts to undermine the United States' official reports, as well
as the authority of the EPA Administrator.
We are concerned that the new litigation is an improper product
of that close relationship, and we therefore ask that you
investigate this."
Bush administration admits climate change real
At the end of May 2002, the United States submitted a report to
the United Nations on Global warming. The report, the Climate
Action Report 2002, was written by scientists from government,
industry, universities and non-governmental organisations. While
supporting President Bush's position of inaction against Carbon
Dioxide emissions, it marked a stark departure in its description
of the problem. The report forecast major impacts on the
continental United States as well as the submersion of barrier
islands, and called for action to minimise the economic
consequences of these events, while saying it was simply too late
to stop them through a program of rigorous emission reductions.
But in the view of Exxon and its pals, the report's conclusion,
that climate change posed a significant risk and was caused by
man-made emissions, was at odds with their agenda to sell more oil,
and the agenda that Bush has been pursuing on their behalf to
question the reality of climate change and attempt to scupper the
Kyoto protocol. The government report caused a media storm with
headlines across the world like "Climate Changing, US says in
report" from the New York Times. The widespread mis-messaging of
the Exxon agenda almost certainly caused the call for help from the
White House to the CEI.
When Exxon talks, Bush listens
Two days after the memo from Ebell was received, Bush repudiated
the report as having come from "the bureaucracy." This was a
further blow to embattled EPA chief Christine Todd Whitman, who
announced her resignation in May of this year.
The same administration that told us that "Saddam Hussein had
the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard gas,
and VX agent" is still trying to say that "the science on climate
change is inconclusive."
It certainly isn't inconclusive to climate scientists. The
National Academy of Sciences said in 2001 that "There is general
agreement that the observed warming is real and particularly strong
within the past twenty years."
No credible scientist today questions that climate change is
happening or that atmospheric carbon dioxide is the major
contributor.
What's surprising is that despite Bush's refusal to submit the
Kyoto treaty for ratification, his efforts to undermine other
countries' support for the treaty, and his failure to take any
meaningful action whatsoever on climate change, he still hasn't
done enough for the CEI/Exxon agenda. CEI complains that:
"[The Bush Administration] has managed, whether through
incompetence or intention, to create one disaster after another and
then to expect its allies to clean up the mess."
We'd actually concur with the first part of that statement.
Unfortunately, by failing to act on climate change, the
administration is leaving it to future generations to clean up a
much bigger mess than a few disgruntled oil companies.
Take Action!
Write
to the board of directors of the world's largest oil company,
ExxonMobil and tell them to invest in renewable energy and stop
sabotaging action on climate change.
Attack of the speech bubbles: Upload a
picture of yourself saying No to Exxon/Mobil, No to Climate
change.
Visit greenribbonpledge.org
for tips on saving energy at home and at work. Also, take the
Pledge to see how your energy-saving tasks add up.
Learn more about moving toward a clean energy future.