Renewed Golden Rice hype is propaganda for genetic engineering industry

Press release - March 21, 2005
The first steps in reboosting the Golden Rice hype were taken when Ingo Potrykus, the inventor of the genetically engineered (GE) rice, suggested last Friday in a public presentation (1) that the new generation of Golden Rice can contain an amount ten times higher or more, of pro-vitamin A than the rice produced five years ago (2).

Greenpeace warns the public and politicians not to believe Syngenta, the financer of Golden Rice and their misleading promises. They aim at nothing but creating an easy pathway for GE crops in developing countries so they can increase their own profits.

Potrykus severely attacked the current legal regulations for GE seeds last Friday. He demanded that GE crops should be treated as normal plants, and that no environmental or health assessments were needed.

"Syngenta claims to be trying to help people suffering from vitamin A deficiency, but Potrykus' attack made it clear that the GE industry uses Golden Rice to campaign for an easier marketing of GE-seeds," says Christoph Then, Greenpeace GE campaigner who witnessed Potrykus speech. "It looks like the industry is campaigning for their GE seeds while abusing people that suffer from severe malnutrition."

While claims were made of a much higher content of pro-vitamin A, it was admitted during the speech that there are still a lot of unanswered questions. The researchers - even after five years of study - don't know how much pro-vitamin A is left when the rice is cooked, it is unclear how much the human body will take up from the rice and no risk assessments for the environment, nor human health have been performed.

Greenpeace reports, released last Thursday (3), show that the problem of vitamin A deficiency (VAD) needs a diverse approach. VAD exists predominantly in developing countries and affects millions of people. Solutions such as increased food diversity, vitamin A supplementation and home gardening, have proven to be working solutions for VAD. The false hope of Golden Rice distracts the political support that is needed for these solutions. Golden Rice can even make the situation worse, as it promotes rice as a main diet.

"Unfortunately there is no magic solution for this serious problem. This propaganda for Golden Rice will not help people, but take away public awareness from already existing, cheaper and more sustainable solutions for vitamin A deficiency," says Then. "But the message from Potrykus' speech was clear, the GE industry will take on everything to promote their product, whatever the risk for the environment or people will be".

Notes: (1) Ingo Potrykus during the seminar "Golden Rice, vitamin A and blindness - public responsibility and failure" at the Institut for Plant Science in Zurich.(2) Potrykus claimed during his speech that the new generation of Golden Rice can contain up to 40 micrograms pro-vitamin A per gram of GE rice, compared to 1,6 micrograms per gram of GE rice five years ago. These results will be, according to Potrykus, published in Nature Biotechnology in the beginning of April. (3) Greenpeace 2005. Not all that glitters is gold: the false hope of "Golden Rice" (www.greenpeace.org/goldenrice); Lorch, A. 2005. Vitamin A deficiency: diverse causes, diverse solutions (www.greenpeace.org/vitaminA); Frei, M. and Becker, K. 2005. On rice, biodiversity and nutrients (www.greenpeace.org/ricebiodiversity)

Categories