France —
French President Chirac has announced a dramatic recall of the asbestos-laden warship Clemenceau -- it will be turning around and going back to France. Our actions, emails to Chirac and an embarrassing international scandal left France with little choice but to abandon the misguided attempt to dump its own toxic mess on India.
"This is a victory for international law, a victory for Indian workers,
and a victory for workers all across Asia" said Pascal Husting,
Greenpeace France Executive Director. “In today’s globalised world it
is vital that nations, such as France and India, co-operate to uphold
global justice and not shamelessly pass on their responsibility to
those in vulnerable areas of the planet”.
Back in December we highlighted France's attempts to dump an old warship
laden with toxics like deadly asbestos on India. France didn't want to
deal with its own toxic mess - despite our actions to block the
departure of the Clemenceau from the French port of Toulon. We said it
was wrong for France to dump a 27,000-ton warship full of asbestos,
PCBs, lead, mercury, and other toxic chemicals in India to be broken up
by hand in a scrapyard where impoverished workers are injured and die
every day. France insisted it was right and sent the ship to India
anyway.
We weren't going to let them off that easily. In January we reboarded
the warship in the Mediterranean and called on Egypt to block the
passage of the ship. The French government intervened at the highest level to
ensure the ship could continue to head to the ship-breaking beaches of
India.
Meanwhile in India there was a growing media and public scandal.
Greenpeace and our anti-asbestos allies launched lawsuits in both the
French and Indian courts, and India ordered the warship to stay
out of Indian waters pending a final ruling. Online activists around
the
world were peppering the French government with email demanding the
ship return to France. Still France kept the
asbestos ship steaming towards India.
As the Indian Government dithered and the French Government stubbornly
insisted on the dumping plan, media interest intensified and levels of
public anger in India and France increased with every day the ship
continued to sail head-on into the winds of public opposition.
The decision of the French supreme court that Greenpeace was
right came just a few days before a planned state visit to India
by President Chirac, who announced that the warship would
be
turned around and head back to France. Domestic heat over the scandal
had intensified last week when the French Defence Ministry declared
that it could not account for about 30 tonnes of asbestos that was
supposed to be aboard the ship.
The case of the Clemenceau has become a symbol of the moral injustice
of rich countries dumping their toxic waste on poorer countries. Having
tried and failed to offload the ship to other countries, France has finally
been forced to clean up a toxic mess of its own making.
While we savour this victory and the return of the Clemenceau to France
it is just a poster child for a wider problem. Every year a vast
decrepit armada bearing a dangerous cargo of toxic substances,
asbestos, PCBs and heavy metals, ends up in ship-breaking yards in
Bangladesh, India, China and Pakistan, where they are cut up in the
crudest of fashions, taking a huge toll on human health and the local
environment. Shipbreaking is one of the most visible forms of the
trade in toxic waste that ends up dumped in developing countries -- but
that trade is also made up of smaller, more day-to-day items like
phones, computer parts, and portable electronics.
We believe that rich governments should look at the precedent of the
Clemenceau case and take action to reduce the toxic wastes they produce, and to stop the dumping of toxic waste in all
forms on poor countries. Only effective action will prevent another
Clemenceau-style scandal.
If you happen to be connected with the shipping industry, you can also play detective for Greenpeace. Help us spot the 50 worst end-of-life ships before they land up at a recycling yard.
We don't accept donations from governments or corporations: we can name and shame without fear of economic retaliation. But we can only do that with your help.