The demarche condemns the decision to resume commercial whaling, and
the unilateral way it was carried out,
saying:
"Similarly, Iceland has set its quota using
criteria that have not been presented to or reviewed and approved by
the International Whaling Commission’s (IWC) Scientific Committee.
It
deeply concerns us that the Icelandic Government awards itself a quota
that has not been approved according to the applicable international
provisions, before any possible effects on whale populations have been
properly assessed and peer reviewed by those bodies recognised as
competent to manage whale resources."The demarche
also brings up the fact that fin whales are classified as ‘Endangered’
on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, and that the trade in fin
whales is prohibited under the Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).
Iceland has started a "review" of the
CITES listing, but its government is apparently not willing to even
wait for their own scientists to weigh in before it starts stock piling
fin whale meat.
Sign
the Icelandic Pledge now to help end
whaling.Full text of
the demarche:
JOINT DEMARCHE BY ARGENTINA,
AUSTRALIA, AUSTRIA, BELGIUM, BRAZIL, CHILE, THE CZECH
REPUBLIC, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, FINLAND, FRANCE, GERMANY, IRELAND,
ISRAEL, ITALY, LUXEMBOURG, MEXICO, MONACO, THE NETHERLANDS, NEW
ZEALAND, PERU, PORTUGAL, THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC, SPAIN, SWEDEN, THE UNITED
KINGDOM, and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
We, the
Governments of Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Chile,
The Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy,
Luxembourg, Mexico, Monaco, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Peru,
Portugal, The Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, The United Kingdom and
The United States of America, together with The European Commission are
extremely disappointed that the Icelandic Government has decided to
resume commercial whaling in Icelandic waters, in spite of the
internationally agreed moratorium.
Furthermore, we
are very concerned that Iceland is considering the taking of nine fin
whales, which have been classified as ‘Endangered’ on the IUCN Red List
of Threatened Species, and are listed under CITES Appendix I, together
with thirty common minke whales. We do not agree with this proposed
action, adding as it does to the current catches of common minke whales
under the research plan, which Iceland has been implementing since
2003.
At the 22nd Animals Committee meeting of CITES
– the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Fauna and Flora – which took place in Peru, only last July, Iceland’s
proposed inclusion of the central stock of North Atlantic fin whales in
the periodic review was agreed. Nevertheless, the Icelandic Ministry of
Fisheries has now set its own catch limits, without awaiting the
outcome of this review.
Similarly, Iceland has set
its quota using criteria that have not been presented to or reviewed
and approved by the International Whaling Commission’s (IWC) Scientific
Committee. It deeply concerns us that the Icelandic Government awards
itself a quota that has not been approved according to the applicable
international provisions, before any possible effects on whale
populations have been properly assessed and peer reviewed by those
bodies recognised as competent to manage whale
resources.
We would wish to point to the significant
economic and social benefits which accrue to Iceland arising from its
growing whale-watching industry and express the view that the decision
to commence commercial whaling could seriously undermine those
benefits. We are of the opinion that the decision to commence
commercial whaling sends a wrong signal with regard to Iceland’s
growing whale watching industry.
We call upon
Iceland to respect the moratorium and halt its commercial whaling
operations. We believe that commercial whaling quotas determined and
prosecuted in the absence of any agreed management system undermines
the proper functioning of the IWC.
We repeat our
countries' opposition to this operation and urge the Government of
Iceland to reconsider its position and reverse this unnecessary
decision, and to abandon its current operations. We remind Iceland that
19 countries registered a formal objection with the United States
Government (as the depository country for the instrument of adherence
to the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling) to
Iceland’s Reservation on commercial whaling when they rejoined the IWC
in 2002.