Pages above:
EU Trade Commissioner Pascal Lamy receives from Greenpeace Italy Genetic Engineering campaigner Federica Ferrario sacks of soy contaminated with genetically engineered (GE) varieties by the US-multinational GE company Monsanto.
Enlarge ImageFor example, the EU has just adopted the world's strongest rules on the labelling of GMOs. To the GE industry and its backers in the Bush Administration, the rules are a threat to their plans to force-feed the world GMOs, because they not only help to identify and exclude GE ingredients in Europe, but also serve as model legislation for other countries planning to regulate GMOs. The US is, therefore, challenging the EU's GMO policy through the WTO and is expected to broaden its complaint against the EU's GMO moratorium, to include opposing the EU's new GMO labelling regulations.
By bringing this complaint, the US is also trying to use the WTO to override crucial environmental agreements, like the first legally binding global agreement that allows countries to reject GMOs, the Biosafety Protocol.
When EU trade ministers next meet at the WTO ministerial meeting in Cancun in September, they need to make the US understand that GMOs are not an issue for the WTO to regulate. Instead, action needs to be taken to implement and strengthen the UN Protocol on Biosafety, which will enter into force during the Cancun meeting. The Biosafety Protocol represents a much-needed tool, especially for developing countries wishing to ban or restrict GMO imports.
"We urge the EU Trade Ministers to recognise that protecting the environment and people from the hazards of GMOs is not a trade issue but a biosafety one," said Frederica Ferrario, Greenpeace genetic engineering campaigner in Italy.