Pages above:
Culture jamming the Esso logo at the entrance to a large station near the Germany-Luxembourg border in Wasserbillig.
Enlarge Image
This is the company which, apparently, has been "misunderstood" on
global warming and in February of this year claimed it had dropped its
funding of the deniers.
The ExxonSecrets people have gone through the documents, and found a clear answer: last year Exxon spent US$2.1 million on 41 groups who are leading the climate sceptic industry.
While the company has been forced to drop the hottest potato of them all, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and another particularly vocal denier, Steve "Junk Science" Milloy, the rest of them are still on the payroll.
Like who? The Heartland Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the George C Marshall Institute, the American Enterprise Institute... all the groups who've been at the heart of the climate change denial industry for more than a decade.
These include the groups who were listed in a 1998 American Petroleum Institute memo outlining a communications strategy for taking down the Kyoto Protocol.
So despite its protestations, the company is still running the sceptic industry. What else is Exxon not telling us?
ExxonSecrets has obtained the company's Exxon Foundation 2005 report to the IRS. Exxon told the IRS that that it funded 14 groups specifically for their climate change work. But somehow the company didn’t mention this in public.
Exxon has always been quick to point out that it just gives these groups general funding and doesn’t tell them what to do or how to spend the money.
But giving money to the Frontiers of Freedom for their "climate change efforts" seems pretty specific. Especially when those "efforts" included an eight-page report dedicated entirely to questioning global warming science, policy and attacking Al Gore.
"The truth is, there is no conclusive or reliable scientific proof that the sky is falling or that Earth's climate is experiencing cataclysmic warming caused by man's activities," says Frontiers for Freedom. Last year Exxon rewarded these efforts with a US$180,000 grant, up from US$80,000 the year before.
Another is the George C Marshall Institute, whose CEO William O'Keefe (former American Petroleum Institute officer and registered ExxonMobil lobbyist) recently referred to the April 2007 ruling by the US Supreme Court (that the EPA has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide) as "a triumph of judicial activism…ideology… political science" by a court that "may have been too influenced by political correctness and climate orthodoxy." The institute got US$85,000 from Exxon in 2006.
This company has now funded the climate change denial industry to the tune of US$22 million since 1998. Last year the UK's prestigious scientific body, the Royal Society, wrote to Exxon asking them to stop funding the groups who were "misinforming the public about the science of climate change". Exxon indicated to the Royal Society that they had - and they would. In February this year Exxon did a big public relations round of the media, saying it had been "misunderstood" on climate change and gave the clear indication that it had dropped its funding of the climate sceptic industry.
"Exxon softens its stance on climate change" screamed the headlines. But very little has changed, except Exxon's PR machine. It's been business as usual at the Dallas HQ, no matter what they said in public.
The ExxonSecrets people have gone through the documents, and found a clear answer: last year Exxon spent US$2.1 million on 41 groups who are leading the climate sceptic industry.
While the company has been forced to drop the hottest potato of them all, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and another particularly vocal denier, Steve "Junk Science" Milloy, the rest of them are still on the payroll.
Like who? The Heartland Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the George C Marshall Institute, the American Enterprise Institute... all the groups who've been at the heart of the climate change denial industry for more than a decade.
These include the groups who were listed in a 1998 American Petroleum Institute memo outlining a communications strategy for taking down the Kyoto Protocol.
So despite its protestations, the company is still running the sceptic industry. What else is Exxon not telling us?
ExxonSecrets has obtained the company's Exxon Foundation 2005 report to the IRS. Exxon told the IRS that that it funded 14 groups specifically for their climate change work. But somehow the company didn’t mention this in public.
Exxon has always been quick to point out that it just gives these groups general funding and doesn’t tell them what to do or how to spend the money.
But giving money to the Frontiers of Freedom for their "climate change efforts" seems pretty specific. Especially when those "efforts" included an eight-page report dedicated entirely to questioning global warming science, policy and attacking Al Gore.
"The truth is, there is no conclusive or reliable scientific proof that the sky is falling or that Earth's climate is experiencing cataclysmic warming caused by man's activities," says Frontiers for Freedom. Last year Exxon rewarded these efforts with a US$180,000 grant, up from US$80,000 the year before.
Another is the George C Marshall Institute, whose CEO William O'Keefe (former American Petroleum Institute officer and registered ExxonMobil lobbyist) recently referred to the April 2007 ruling by the US Supreme Court (that the EPA has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide) as "a triumph of judicial activism…ideology… political science" by a court that "may have been too influenced by political correctness and climate orthodoxy." The institute got US$85,000 from Exxon in 2006.
This company has now funded the climate change denial industry to the tune of US$22 million since 1998. Last year the UK's prestigious scientific body, the Royal Society, wrote to Exxon asking them to stop funding the groups who were "misinforming the public about the science of climate change". Exxon indicated to the Royal Society that they had - and they would. In February this year Exxon did a big public relations round of the media, saying it had been "misunderstood" on climate change and gave the clear indication that it had dropped its funding of the climate sceptic industry.
"Exxon softens its stance on climate change" screamed the headlines. But very little has changed, except Exxon's PR machine. It's been business as usual at the Dallas HQ, no matter what they said in public.
