The ACLU filed a lawsuit in US federal court charging that the FBI is
wrongfully withholding information about its investigations of peaceful
organizations. The FBI has thousands of pages on Greenpeace, the ACLU,
and other organisations but to date less than 20 pages have been
received under Freedom of Information Act requests.
The lawsuit seeks to compel the Justice Department to comply with
requests that the ACLU filed last year for records kept on a wide range
of organisations, including Greenpeace, the American-Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee, People for the Ethical Treatment of
Animals, United for Peace and Justice, Code Pink, the Muslim Public
Affairs Council, the National Lawyers Guild and the ACLU itself.
The controversial Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTF) creates
partnerships between the FBI and local police, in which local officers
are "deputized" as federal agents. This allows police to target
peaceful political and religious groups with no connection to
terrorism. It's pure coincidence, of course, that targets for
investigation tend to be vocal opponents of George Bush's environmental
and social policies.
A
classified FBI memorandum
disclosed publicly in November 2003 revealed that the FBI has actually
directed police to target and monitor lawful political demonstrations
under the guise of fighting terrorism. Under policies put in
place by former Attorney General John Ashcroft, the FBI - working with
local police through JTTFs - can now gather information about people
who express their disagreement with U.S. government policies - for no
better reason than that they disagree.
Ivan Blokov, campaign director for Greenpeace Russia, is familiar with
the model. "This looks exactly like the mandate that the KGB had in
Soviet times in my country."
John Passcantando, Executive Director of Greenpeace USA, says "America
will have no credibility as an advocate of democracy abroad if we can't
conduct democracy at home. A government that can't maintain a
distinction between terror and non-violent dissent is not a healthy
government."
Suppressing dissent
In July 2003 the Bush administration brought an unprecedented legal
case against Greenpeace in attempt to shut us down. It was the
first time ever in the US that an organization was criminally
prosecuted for the free speech activities of its supporters; in this
case, a non-violent direct action against a shipment of mahogany which
was itself illegal under US law. Despite massive resources and
truly strained legal manoevering by the Justice Department, which
attempted to prosecute Greenpeace under a century-old law barring
prostitutes from boarding ships in port, a
federal judge threw out the
charges during trial in May 2004.
Having failed to shut us down via the courts, it appears the Bush
Administration has decided that, given how hard it is to find
terrorists abroad, the investigative resources of the fight against
terror should go into spying on Greenpeace. This is a bit like
looking for a coin across the street from where you lost it because the
light is better.
It's also an absurd and criminal waste of time and money.
As Rainbow Warrior captain Pete Willcox said recently, "We're pretty
open about what we're doing and don't have many secrets. Infiltrating
Greenpeace is like infiltrating the YMCA."
The FBI has better things to do than ensure George Bush is insulated
from criticism. A government that wants to promote democracy has
to practice it.
More info
Check out the
ACLU’s story on the case