Pages above:
Not only will Rokkasho use a dangerous, dirty process to create a product Japan can't use, it will also increase the risks to nuclear weapons proliferation in the region, said Greenpeace campaigner Shaun Burnie. "The on-going tension in northeast Asia over nuclear weapons can only be reduced if countries such as Japan and North Korea halt their pursuit of nuclear materials which can be used in such weapons."
IAEA cannot demonstrate ability to safeguard
According to the new Greenpeace report, International Atomic Energy Agency "safeguards" technology applied at the plant will not be able to detect the theft or deliberate diversion of tens of kilograms of plutonium each year. That's enough each year to build several nuclear weapons.
Summarising the safeguards technology to be used at Rokkasho, including enhanced "Near-Real Time Accountancy" techniques, the report concurs with the United
States Government Office of Technology Assessment that, "To date, the IAEA has not considered the possibility that it may be unable to safeguard large facilities but neither has it been able to demonstrate that it can".
U.S.: Don't allow exports
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is now reviewing an export licence from Mitsubishi Nuclear Fuel Company Ltd. to ship depleted uranium to Rokkasho. Greenpeace objects, and has called for a thorough U.S. assessment of nuclear proliferation risks at Rokkasho. Given these risks, the U.S. should reject exports of uranium that would help the Rokkosho start its operation.
Rokkasho: We'll be watching
Later this week scientists from French radiation laboratory CRIIRAD will begin extensively sampling around Rokkasho-mura and Northern mainland Japan. Greenpeace supports the research because it will independently verify the background levels of radioactivity around the plant before Rokkasho starts operation