Toxic waste water from a industrial estate in Thailand where electronics are manufactured.
Enlarge Image
Amsterdam, International —
Greenpeace today released ‘Cutting Edge Contamination: A study of environmental pollution during the manufacture of electronic products’ (1). The report shows that some of the electronics industries’ biggest brands, and their suppliers, are contaminating rivers and underground wells with a wide range of hazardous chemicals.
Analysis of samples taken from industrial estates in China, Mexico, the
Philippines and Thailand, reveals the release of hazardous chemicals in
each of the three sectors investigated: printed wiring board (PWB)
manufacture, semiconductor chip manufacture and component assembly (2).
Most
noteworthy was the discovery at the majority of sites investigated of
polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), a group of brominated chemicals
used as flame retardants, and of phthalates, chemicals used in a wide
range processes and materials, though they are most commonly used as
plasticisers (softeners) in some plastics (3).
“Over recent
years we have seen an increasing concern over the use of hazardous
chemicals in electronic products but attention has focussed on the
contamination released during disposal or ‘recycling of electronic
waste’”, said Dr. Kevin Brigden from the Greenpeace Research
Laboratories. “Our findings of contamination arising during the
manufacturing stage make it clear that only when we factor in the
complete life cycle will the full environmental costs of electronic
devices begin to emerge.”
The electronics industry is truly
global with individual components manufactured at specialised
facilities around the world often involving highly resource and
chemical intensive processes, generating hazardous wastes, the fate and
effects of which are still very poorly documented.
“There is
shockingly little information on precisely which major brand companies
are supplied by which manufacturing facilities. Responsibility for the
contamination lies as much with those brands as with the facilities
themselves,” said Zeina Alhajj, Toxics Campaigner, Greenpeace
International, “There has to be full transparency regarding the supply
chain within the electronics industry, so that brand owners are forced
to take responsibility for the environmental impacts of producing their
goods."
The study also documents the contamination of
groundwater aquifers at a number of sites, particularly around
semiconductor manufacturers, with toxic chlorinated volatile organic
chemicals (VOCs) and toxic metals including nickel. Contamination of
groundwater is of particular concern, since local communities in many
places use groundwater for drinking water. At one site, the Cavite
Export Processing Zone (CEPZA) in the Philippines, three samples
contained chlorinated VOCs above World Health Organisation (WHO) limits
for drinking water. One sample contained tetrachloroethene at 9 times
above the WHO guidance values for exposure limits and 70 times the US
Environmental Protection Agency maximum contaminant level for drinking
water. Elevated levels of metals, particularly copper, nickel and zinc,
were also found in groundwater samples in some sites (4).
The use of such toxic chemicals in manufacturing processes also poses potential risks to workers through workplace exposure.
Wastewater
discharged from an IBM site in Guadalajara, Mexico contained hazardous
compounds, including some (such as the potent hormone disruptor
nonylphenol) which were not found at other sites. IBM’s ‘Supplier
Conduct Principles Guidelines’ state that suppliers should operate in a
manner that is protective of the environment. “IBM should act upon our
findings and investigate activities at the site in order to prevent any
releases of persistent organic compounds from the Guadalajara site,”
Al-Hajj stressed.
“The tragic and undocumented persistent
contamination of people and the environment by the global electronics
industry, which hides behind the anonymity of its supplier chain, must
end. These facilities and the brands which pay for them must be fully
investigated and the pollution must stop. Electronics manufacturing
remains at the cutting edge of technological development and has a
strong economic future. There is no reason why it should not also be at
the cutting edge when it comes to clean designs and technologies,
substitution of hazardous chemicals, greater worker health protection
and the prevention of environmental pollution at source,” concluded
Zeina Alhajj.
Notes to Editor
1. Online version available at: http://www.greenpeace.org/electronicsproductionreport 2. The report analyses samples taken from: IBM, HP, Intel, Sony and Sanyo, Fortune, Compeq, Elec&Eltek, CKL Electronics, KCE, PCTT, On Semicon (also known as on Semiconductor), Kemet, Flextronics, Jabil, Solectron, and Sanmina; and industrial estates where some of these are situated: Navanakorn, Bangpa-in, Hi-Tech, Rojana, Gateway Business Park, Cavite Export Processing Zone (CEPZA) 3. PBDEs and many phthalates are known to be toxic, and some are also persistent in the environment. Certain PBDEs are highly bioaccumulative (able to build up to high concentrations in animals and humans). 4. Copper and Nickel are widely used in the PWB manufacture of electronics. Effects from copper to aquatic life can occur at very low levels including reduction in growth and fertility rate. Ingestion of some nickel compounds can cause toxic effects in humans and animals.