It was realised by the mid-18th century that some gases in the Earth's atmosphere, such as carbon dioxide, trap heat and keep the Earth warm. At the start of the 20th century, a Swedish scientist named Svante Arrhenius put forward the idea that human emissions of carbon dioxide would eventually raise temperatures. He didn't see this as a particularly bad thing, and most scientists at the time were sceptical that humans could burn fossil fuels fast enough to have a noticeable impact at all.
So, although the idea that mankind could influence Earth's global
temperature was proposed over a century ago, it wasn't until relatively
recently that scientists were able to confirm this with confidence.
Data had to be gathered from around the world, technology had to
develop to allow us to analyse that data, and basic advances in physics
and other disciplines had to come about before we could understand it.
What we now know about the climate is thanks to literally generations
of dedicated researchers.
However, it is also easier to observe
human caused climate change today because we’ve put so much more carbon
dioxide into the climate system over the past century that the impacts
of climate change are now clearly visible, affecting people and
ecosystems all over the world.. More cars, more factories, and more
power plants – all are changing the climate faster than was previously
possible – and causing more obvious changes.
Taking the planet's temperature
To
get an accurate picture of how warm the Earth is, you need measurements
from all over because the whole planet does not heat up at the same
rate. In fact, some parts might even cool down while the world as a
whole heats up. Also, many temperature readings are needed over time
to develop an accurate long-term picture. In order to develop a global
temperature history, researchers have had to travel to the farthest
corners of the Earth, and come up with ways to "go back in time".
Some sources of past temperature data:
- Historical records – Includes sources like ship's logs, farmer's
diaries and newspaper articles. When carefully evaluated these can
provide can provide both quantitative and qualitative data.
- Personal accounts and oral histories – Useful information
can be gathered especially from the older generations of indigenous
people who have always relied on nature for their survival, and so are
particularly observant of changes over the past decades.
- Direct (e.g. thermometer) measurements – Only go back around
300 years, and are very sparse until about 150 years ago. Also,
differences in thermometer types and other variables have to be taken
into account.
- Data collected by balloon and satellite – Very useful, but only available since 1979.
- Tree ring thickness – Width and density varies depending on growing conditions.
- Ocean and lake sediments – Billions of tons of sediments
accumulate each year. The tiny preserved fossils and chemicals in
layers of sediment can be used interpret past climate.
- Coral skeletons – The water temperature that the coral grew
in can be determined from trace metals, oxygen and the isotopes of
oxygen contained in its skeleton.
- Fossil pollen – Each plant has uniquely shaped pollen.
Knowing what plants were growing at a particular time in the fossil
record lets scientists make inferences about what the climate was like
at the time.
- Ice cores – Over the centuries snow falling on high
mountains and the polar ice caps packs down and becomes solid ice. Dust
and air bubbles trapped in this ice provide valuable climate data. For
example, the air trapped in the ice serves as a record of carbon
dioxide concentrations across the millennia.
- Observed melting – Rates of glacial retreat, permafrost
thaw, shrinking polar ice caps and reduction in Arctic sea ice are
indicators of both short and long term climate change.
The
important thing is not to look at any one source of data independently,
but instead to take them together. This produces a scientifically
compelling picture of a warming world that matches with the
corresponding increase in greenhouse gasses.
Predicting the climate future
Global
climate models are mathematical representations of the real world's
climate. Some models are attempts by scientists to boil the complex
behaviour of the climate down to (comparatively!) simple formulas in an
attempt to understand the forces at work. However, when people talk
about specific predictions of long term climate behaviour they are
usually talking about general circulation models. In these models, the
equations are tweaked (within reason) until the model is able to
predict past and present conditions, as accurately as possible, when
tested against actual observations of past and present conditions.
Since
it's impossible to know every last variable, and because the model will
never match the real world perfectly, scientists compensate by running
each model over and over, while making tiny changes to the starting
conditions (increasing the wind speed over Detroit by one percent, for
example) and other factors. This way they can get an idea of the
different possible outcomes. If one result occurs more frequently then
another then it's the more likely outcome.
In the end, each
model predicts a range of possible outcomes. For example, the IPCC,
taking into account all of the different available models, settled on a
projected global temperature rise of 1.4 – 5.8° Celsius (about 3 to 8°
Fahrenheit). No one can say exactly how much the temperature will
increase over the next hundred years, but with a couple of caveats it
is a safe bet that it will be within this range.
The caveats
One
thing climate models can not predict are all the possible effects of
feedback mechanisms, which might help stabilise the climate or cause
the climate to change much faster and in unpredictable ways. Of course,
it would be irresponsible to ignore the climate models and hope for the
best because of these uncertainties. See our feedback effects page for
more information.
Another thing these models can not really
predict is human behaviour, and ingenuity. We could burn more fossil
fuels than expected, and end up with a hotter planet then even the
worst case scenario. Or we could deploy renewable energy and energy
efficiency solutions faster then thought possible – eliminating the
likelihood of the higher temperature ranges.
US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration – Climate proxy data
American Institute of Physics - History of climate change research
The Climate Change Connection – Climate research
ClimatePrediction.Net – Distributed computing climate modelling project (join the Greenpeace team on the project!)