How to reduce Kyoto angst? Cut emissions

Press release - April 20, 2007
The angst around New Zealand's Kyoto liability is the inevitable consequence of delaying efforts to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, Greenpeace said today.

As Greenpeace activists ocupy the proposed Marsden B coal fired power station, the the sun rises over the beach on the day the Kyoto Protocol comes into force in Ruakaka, New Zealand.

Greenpeace Executive Director Bunny McDiarmid said that since we signed Kyoto New Zealand could have been steadily reducing emissions. But no policies were yet in place.

"Since Kyoto, we have sat back smugly, relying totally on forests to soak up carbon, and not lifting a finger to reduce our actual greenhouse gas emissions else. This has made us the 7th worst country in the OECD for emission increases," said Greenpeace Executive Director Bunny McDiarmid.

"In 1995, we warned the Government (1) that if it relied on forests to soak up our emissions, it would end up in big trouble.  And that's exactly where we are today," she said.

She pointed out that not a single policy was yet in place to encourage New Zealand to reduce its C02 emissions.

"Judging by the Government's current proposals, we cannot expect any policies to deliver emissions reductions until at least 2012. In this time, we can only expect our liaibility to continue to go up," she said.

Greenpeace said the Government needs to introduce a bold package of policy measures to reduce emissions and called for a carbon tax to be introduced immediately.

"The longer New Zealand as a whole waits to act on Kyoto the more we pay."

Other contacts: Media: Cindy Baxter 021 772 661
Interviews: Bunny McDiarmid 021 838 183

Notes: (1) Hamilton, K, B Hare and B Weeber (1995) The New Zealand Effect: Why sinks Won't Save the Climate. Greenpeace, ECO and Forest and Bird.