You Are Here:
Greenpeace volunteer Tanith Carrington in the process of planting a tree as part of the Greenpeace reforestation activity on Landcorp land, near Taupo. Over 30 Greenpeace volunteers replanted over 1000 trees on land cleared for dairy farming.
magnify image
Just as state-owned enterprise Solid Energy is expanding the mining and export of coal, Landcorp is overseeing the conversion of land from forestry to intensive dairy - a practice that once again illustrates the Government's inability to reconcile its clean and green aspirations with real action on climate change.
Early this morning a team of Greenpeace activists took action and reforested an area of new dairy pasture.
Large-scale deforestation and intensification of dairy farming is being pursued with the bottom line, not New Zealand's larger social, economic and environmental welfare in mind.
It is risking economic damage by destroying New Zealand's clean, green image, and while deforestation is a national issue, it is mostly occurring in just two regions: the Central North Island and Canterbury.
In the Tahorakuri Forest between Taupo and Rotorua for example, more than 25,000 hectares of pine plantations - of which a quarter is the Tahorakuri Forest - have been earmarked for conversion into 20 dairy units, with a large sheep, beef and dairy heifer unit located on the steeper ground.
Greenpeace not anti-farming. Far from it. We want New Zealand to be farming into the future by passing on truly sustainable, healthy farms to the next generations.
This is unlikely to occur, however, if we continue down the road of recklessly deforesting, expanding, and intensifying farming at great environmental cost, simultaneously increasing the risk of economic damage by destroying New Zealand's clean and green image.
The intensification of dairy will also increase pressure on scarce water resources, increase the use of fertilisers and chemical inputs onto land and increase the level of pollution that dairying already contributes to New Zealand's fragile waterways and lakes.
What we need to do instead is halt this intensive dairy expansion until we are in a position to farm more sustainably, and more widely deploy the improved farming practices that a growing number of New Zealand farmers are already using to significant economic and environmental benefit.
Also essential for the climate and New Zealand's clean green image is that the agriculture sector is held accountable for its emissions. It must be brought in under the Government's emissions trading scheme in the next two years (as opposed to 2013 as currently stipulated).
The Government and other political parties can talk all they want about carbon neutrality and world leadership on climate change, but if the expansion of high-polluting industries such as agriculture and coal is not curbed then we cannot argue we're doing our bit in this global challenge.
Greenpeace is calling on the Government and all political parties to commit to an emissions reduction target of 30 per cent by 2020.
For more about this issue please refer to the Frequently Asked Quesionts document:
1. MAF, Area of forest 'at risk' from deforestation, August 2006, http://www.maf.govt.nz/climatechange/forestry/ets/area-at-risk/page-04.htm
2. For a more thorough examination of the flaws in the emissions trading scheme, see www.greenpeace.org.nz/ets-report