You Are Here:
While new product models such as the MacBook Air and the new iMac (2) have made progress in reducing toxic chemicals such as PVC and Brominated Flame Retardants (BFRs), Apple has not announced any new improvements in removing the toxics (PVC, BFRs, antimony) that Greenpeace found present in the first generation iPhone (3).
"Apple is meant to be a world leader in design and marketing, they
should also be a world leader in environmental innovation,” said
Greenpeace spokeswoman Suzette Jackson.
A previous campaign target of Greenpeace for its lagging environmental
performance (4), Apple has made a commitment to completely phase out of
PVC and BFRs in its product line by the end of 2008 (5); other leading
mobile phone providers such as Nokia and Sony Ericsson have already
displayed product lines free of these harmful substances (6).
In June, Apple was ranked 11th of 18 companies in Greenpeace's latest
Guide to Greener Electronics, scoring 4.1 points out of a possible ten
(7).
"The iPhone may be 'Twice as Fast' and 'Half the Price' as Apple
advertises, but based on the iPhone specs from Apple's website, it
seems to have just as many toxic chemicals as previous models,” said
Jackson.
“Steve Jobs has missed an opportunity to reinvent the iPhone in green
and catch up with other leading mobile phone providers such as Nokia
and Sony Ericsson, whose product lines are already free of these
harmful substances”.
(1) http://www.apple.com/iphone/specs.html
(2) http://www.apple.com/macbookair/specs.html & http://www.apple.com/imac/specs/
(3) October 2007 analysis of the original iPhone by Greenpeace International http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/iPhones-hazardous-chemicals.pdf
(4) http://www.greenmyapple.org/
(5) http://www.apple.com/environment/materials/
(6) http://www.nokia.com/A4288185 & http://www.sonyericsson.com/cws/download/1/354/670/1205498375/PD101000005175_A_135%5B1%5D.pdf
(7) http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up