สิ่งพิมพ์และรายงาน

เอกสารนี้บรรยายถึงวิสัยทัศน์ของกรีนพีซว่าเราจะป้องกันมิให้เกิดการเปลี่ยนแปลงของสภาพภูมิอากาศที่เป็นอันตรายอย่างไร เริ่มต้นจากการวิเคราะห์โดยย่อเรื่องสาเหตุ ผลกระทบในปัจจุบัน และความเสี่ยงในอนาคตของการเปลี่ยนแปลงสภาพภูมิอากาศ เราวิเคราะห์ถึงการเพิ่...

Greenpeace, with a coalition of six NGO's and a group of 47 NGO experts from around the world, has written the Copenhagen Treaty - a blueprint for what we want to see world leaders agree when they meet at the Climate Summit in Copenhagen in...

Toshiba drops to 7th place with a reduced score of 5.3, losing points on the chemicals and energy criteria. It drops a point on its understanding of the precautionary principle due to a much poorer explanation of this important principle on...

Sony moves up two places to 5th, and increases its score to 5.5. It gains points on the energy efficiency of its products by reporting that all new models of TVs released in 2008 meet the latest ES requirements, and 45% of new models of “VAIO”...

Sony Ericsson drops one place to 3rd with a reduced score of 5.7. It loses a point for its limited definition of the principle of Individual Producer Responsibility; it also needs to increase its lobbying for IPR, continue to extend its take-back...

Sharp moves up the ranking from 10th place to 9th with an unchanged overall score of 4.9 points. Sharp scores well for its policy and practice on toxic chemical issues although it loses points for its incomplete definition of the precautionary...

Samsung leaps to 2nd place, up from 4th in v.10 and increases its score from 5.9 to 6.9, scoring relatively well on all criteria. Since November 2007, all new models of LCD panels are PVC-free, important in driving the market to phase out PVC,...

Philips soars up the ranking from 15th place to 4th, scoring 5.7, because the penalty point incurred a year ago (v.7) has now been lifted; this was incurred for regressive lobbying against the principle of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR)...

Panasonic falls from 9th to 12th place and its score drops to 4.3 points, as a result of losing points for its confusing definition of the Precautionary Principle which it needs to define further. It also loses points for not reporting to the...